Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp≤.051.0× alphagold
A main effect of form of script was marginally significant (F (1,46) = 4.02, p≤.05, η p 2 = .08), and the estimated marginal means suggested that the pointed script (mean = 346.40, SE = 2.95) elicited delayed amplitudes in comparison to the unpointed script (mean = 342.56, SE = 2.88).
marginally significantP = 0·051.0× alphagold
Animal protein intake was related to lower BMI when substituted for plant protein in analyses excluding underweight participants, but this association was marginally significant ( β per 1 % energy increment –0·11; 95 % CI: –0·23, 0·00; P = 0·05; P trend across Q1–Q4 = 0·04).
marginally significantp=0.051.0× alphagold
The SMD for surgery versus sham surgery was non-significant for pain-related conditions (n=15, SMD=0.13, p=0.08), marginally significant for studies on weight loss (n=10, SMD=0.52, p=0.05) and significant for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) studies (n=5, SMD=0.65, p<0.001) and for other conditions (n=8, SMD=0.44, p=0.004).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
There was a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (1, 59) = 3.88, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.06, because children who were given credibility information at test ( M = 0.56, SD = 0.14) reported more details from the credible website than those not provided with information ( M = 0.47, SD = 0.15).
marginally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
The numbers of species per plot differed significantly among years and refaunated plots hosted more species (mean: 25.7 ± 4.96SD) than neglected ones (23.5 ± 4.50SD), except for 2018 with an opposite pattern, resulting into marginally significant management x year interaction (mixed linear model, year F = 2.83 (df: 3, 45.04), P < 0.05; management F = 4.41 (df: 1, 44.60), P < 0.05; interaction F = 2.60 (df: 3, 45.09), P = 0.06).
marginally significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
Sensitivity Analysis Using Self-Reported Glaucoma Definition When glaucoma was defined solely by self-reported physician diagnosis (167 cases, 2785 controls), a marginally significant association with higher serum Klotho levels was observed (OR = 1.05 per 100 pg/mL increase; 95% CI, 1.00–1.10; P = 0.05 in both models).