For allodynia, this model yielded a significant time by condition interaction (unstandardized β = −5.28, p = 0.002) and state PCS was a marginally significant predictor (unstandardized β = 2.40, p = 0.05).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The results revealed a significant two‐way interaction effect on the problem‐solving related math anxiety subscale (ATS F = 11.54, df = 1, p < .001) and a marginally significant interaction on the school setting‐related math anxiety subscale (ATS F = 3.84, df = 1, p = .050).
We also observed a marginally significant interaction between the training group and concreteness ( b = 1.47, t (3949) = 1.98, p = .05; d = .06).
In the second 24 hour period following infection, where infection status had a strong absolute effect on fecundity, this correlation becomes marginally significant ( r = −0.324, p = 0.050).
This difference was marginally significant (p=0.05) ( Fig.2D ).
We found a marginally significant sex difference at 1 h post wake-up ( p = 0.05), indicating that women had higher cortisol output at this time-point, but no other sex differences for any of the cortisol time points (all p ’s > 0.11).
There was a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (1, 59) = 3.88, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.06, because children who were given credibility information at test ( M = 0.56, SD = 0.14) reported more details from the credible website than those not provided with information ( M = 0.47, SD = 0.15).
In patients with svPPA, there was a significant effect of atrophy within the SN principal gradient ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant effects within the limbic and visual networks ( p = 0.05).
[ 37 ] was excluded from analysis, overall result became marginally significant with mean difference of − 0.54 (95% CI [− 1.08, 0.00], P = 0.05).
The effect of WfH group walks in green corridor environments was marginally significant (β = 0.15, p = 0.05). 3.2.2.
However, left-sided location and AB of SRH were more common in the rebleeding group than in the non-rebleeding group, and these differences were considered marginally significant ( P = 0.05 and P = 0.08, respectively).
Age showed a marginally significant association with severe ARDS (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00–1.11, P = 0.050).
On the other hand, the interocular differences for the BF_0.3 condition were significantly higher than the other filter conditions for the OSI ( p < 0.001), being marginally significant when compared to BF_0.4 (for MTF cut‐off, F 1 , 6 = 5.93, p = 0.05 and for OSI, F 1 , 6 = 5.78, p = 0.05).
During follow-up, 13 patients died (11 in the EBL group and 2 in the EVO group); the survival rate was marginally significant between two groups ( P =0.050).
When divided into three groups based on uterine size (<10 cm, 10 to <15 cm, and ≥15 cm), patients in the TLH group had larger uteri than those in the LAVH group, with a marginally significant difference ( P =0.05) ( Table 1 ). 2.
Results and Discussion The MTT results indicate that treatment with lithium increases neuronal viability in comparison with the control cells, with a marginally significant difference ( p < 0.05).
Stratified analysis showed a marginally significant relationship between DASH dietary patterns and risk of CKD in prospective cohort studies (Pooled risk estimate: 0.79, 95% CI 0.61–1.01; p = 0.05), and no significant association in cross-sectional studies.
The main effect of object size was marginally significant (F(1,24) = 4.16, p>.05, η p 2 = .15).
The interaction between type of stimulus and form of script was marginally significant ( F (1,31) = 4.08, p≤ .05, η p 2 = .12). t -tests suggested significantly longer reaction times in response to the pointed script only in reading of words ( t (31) = 3.29, p <.01).
Data with p < 0.01 were considered as highly significant, with p < 0.05 considered as statistically significant and with p ≤ 0.1 as marginally significant.
TF-IDF demonstrated the weakest correlation, with a marginally significant correlation only with expert-generated questions (ρ = 0.38, p < 0.05), while correlations with ACG-MCQ performance (ρ = 0.30, p = 0.13) and real-world questions ( ρ = 0.28, p = 0.16) were not statistically significant.
Briefly, patients with and without VH did not differ for any demographic, clinical or neuropsychological characteristics, except for the NPI total score ( p = 0.01) and the presence of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).
In addition, high cardiorespiratory fitness showed marginally significant ( P < 0.05) relationship with the mental component of HRQoL (see Table 3 and Figure 2 ).
Having previous policy experience was not significantly related to whether participants selected ‘Yes’ or ‘Maybe’ (GLM: χ 2 1 = 0.0084, P > 0.05), but gender did have a marginally significant association with men more likely to select ‘Yes’ (GLM: χ 2 1 = 3.94, P < 0.05; n = 260 individual respondents).
Using significant meQTLs on chromosome 1, analyses using only African American samples ( N = 112) showed that 99.91% of the meQTLs were directionally consistent with the full analysis, with 92% marginally significant ( P < 0.05) and 66% genome-wide significant (FDR < 0.01) in the smaller sample size and an overall sharing of π 1 = 0.995.