“marginally significant”

For PEOU, the results show that neighborhood and built environment are statistically significant ( P =.01), whereas economic stability is marginally significant ( P =.05).

The effect of the 3-way interaction was marginally significant (B = −1.03, SE = 0.52, t (125) = −1.97, p = 0.05, f 2 = 3.1%; Figure 3 ).

A total of 22 783 and 11 362 CpG sites had marginally significant interaction p-values ( P < .05) for SBP and DBP, respectively.

Marginally significant results (assuming p < 0.05) are seen between specific groups with respect to their intra-sample diversity, evenness, and richness metrics.

Hispanic race was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Without the presence of an alpha value, the P value can be interpreted as P > 0.10, not significant; P ≤ 0.10, marginally significant; P ≤ 0.05, significant; and P ≤ 0.01, highly significant.

Further, the differences in CSF p -tau levels between two clusters were marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Table 1 and Figure 2B ).

During presumptive sleep, there was a marginally significant interaction of genotype and age on Type I post-sigh apnea frequency (F 2,64 = 3.113, p = 0.050, 2-way mixed effects ANOVA), driven by a significantly higher sigh frequency in aged rTg4510 mice (1.1 ± 0.3 apneas/min) vs . young (0.6 ± 0.2; p = 0.019) and age-matched nTg controls (0.1 ± 0.1; p < 0.001; Figure 4E ).

For those aged < 70 years, only a marginally significant correlation was found ( B = − 0.047, 95% CI − 0.095 to 0.000, P = 0.05) (Fig. 4 a).

The results, after adjusting for covariates, indicated that adolescents who experienced parental divorce reported higher internalizing problems than did adolescents who remained in intact families, but the difference was marginally significant, F = 3.64, p = .05 (see Fig. 1 ).

The main reasons of this bias were the lack of statistical testing or improper reporting of test results (63.3% of cases) and interpretation of marginally significant results (p < 0.05, p < 0.1 and p around 0.05) as indicators of effectiveness (10.1%).

A marginally significant interaction between bacterial manipulation and diet type ( F 8 , 30 = 2.35; p = 0.05) on the antibacterial activity of hemolymph was also observed.

This was demonstrated to be marginally significant ( P <0.05), but compares poorly to the 70% inhibition of α -MSH on HBL cells, and 35% inhibition on A375-SM cells.

Interaction test for OS between treatment and PIK3CA was significant in the univariate ( P = 0.04) and marginally significant in the multivariate analysis ( P = 0.05).

As before, a main effect of probability ( F 2.0,32.6 = 38.4, = .510, p < .001) and a lesion × probability interaction ( F 2.0,32.6 = 4.29, = .510, p = .022) were present; in addition, there was a marginally significant lesion × hunger × probability interaction ( F 4,64 = 2.51, p = .05).

By using Pearson analysis, tissue Doppler systolic velocity of the septum showed a marginally significant negative correlation with DOX dose (P = 0.05, r = − 0.308).

When 6-month AHI was also included as a covariate in the model, the difference in TNF-a remained marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

We found a marginally significant interaction effect between abundance group, day of sampling and disturbance treatment ( F = 1.7 16 , p = 0.05).

Our results confirmed this with marginally significant correlations ( P <0.05) when g s was plotted versus SAIs ( Fig. 5A ) or versus g smax ( Fig. 5B ).

Linear models showed a marginally significant positive association between leopard fGCM and habitat NDVI values ( t value = 2.003, F (1, 201) = 4.01, P = 0.05) (Supplementary Material, Fig.

IRI and HOMA‐IR decreased from baseline to Week 48, although these decreases were marginally significant ( P = 0.05 and 0.07, respectively).

More interestingly and in line with our predictions, we also observed a marginally significant interaction effect between status relevance and 2D:4D ( F (1,105) = 3.90, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.04).

Gender also displayed a marginally significant association with knowledge levels (p < 0.05), with female participants achieving a higher knowledge score (73.5%) than males (26.5%).

The association between city-level prevalence of the two viruses was analysed using the Spearman rank correlation and found to be marginally significant (r s =0.62, p=0.05).

Follow‐up independent‐samples t tests showed that, compared to the TD group, there was a marginally significant decrease in amplitude for the ASD group at the posterior ROI, t (49) = −1.97, p = 0.05; d = 0.56, and a significant increase in amplitude at the frontal ROI, t (49) = 4.05, p < 0.001; d = 1.14; no group difference was present at the central ROI, t (49) = −1.66, p = 0.10; d = 0.47.