“marginally significant”

The internal medicine department exhibited a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.050), indicating potential variations in the distribution of ESBL-producing E. coli .

The interaction of block and training type was marginally significant, F (3.18, 248.30) = 2.59, p = .05, η p 2 = .032, as accuracy increased more across blocks in the Response conditions than in the Observation conditions.

The movement × condition interaction was not significant for control pictures ( F (1, 58) = .72, p = .40), but it was marginally significant for alcohol pictures ( F (1,58) = 3.92 p = .05).

In the CCD dogs, the difference in %Aβ area between grey matter and white matter was marginally significant ( p = 0.05, Mann-Whitney) ( Table 2 ), thereby supporting the finding of the Aβ plaques being primarily present in the grey matter, and especially in the deep cortical layer V and VI.

Despite concerns about possible adverse effects of statin therapy on heart failure [ 31 ], the non-significant trend toward fewer heart failure deaths due to any cause (70 [0.7%] vs 86 [0.8%]; RR 0.81 [0.59–1.10]; p = 0.2) is supported by a marginally significant reduction in first hospital admission for worsening heart failure or heart failure death (354 [3.4%] vs 405 [3.9%]; RR 0.86 [0.75–1.00]; p = 0.05).

The results show that, except for mean fixation duration—which reached a marginally significant level ( p = 0.050)—no significant differences were found between the two proficiency groups in first fixation duration, total fixation duration, total fixation count, mean pupil diameter, or mean eyelid aperture.

For emotion recognition, partial correlation with progesterone and emotion recognition performance controlling for estradiol revealed a marginally significant association (r = − 0.49, p = .05), while the correlation for affective responsiveness and progesterone (controlled for estradiol) remained similar (r = 0.50, p = .05).

The relationship between number of lymph nodes retrieved and RFS was marginally significant (P = 0.05, Fig. 3 ).

We observed a significant positive association between GDP and the zero point-mass component of incident rate in the middle district (p<0.05), as well as a marginally significant negative association between GDP and the incidence of the disease for the Poisson component in the east district (p>0.05) ( Table 4 ).

During stimulation, real compared to sham tDCS induced a marginally significant increase in win learning rates ( t (19) = 2.08, p = .050, dz = 0.387).

The same pattern was true for first winter survival with the quadratic effect of maternal age being marginally significant when birth weight was removed (χ 2 1 = 3.85, p = 0.050).

Notably, among the other 12 pathways detected in the Wang dataset but not in the Desmedt dataset, 11 were marginally significant in the Desmedt dataset with P < 0.05.

The model was marginally significant ( R 2 Nagelkerke = 0.32, p = 0.05).

Among participants with a mean age under 40 years (Steffens 2022 and Evman 2023), PRP treatment resulted in a marginally significant improvement in olfactory function compared to controls (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI: 0.00 to 4.20, p = 0.05).

Comparing bias scores across groups (see Table 4 ), analyses indicated a significant main effect of valence ( F (2,123) = 6.64, p = .0018) and group ( F (1,124) = 5.78, p = .0177) with patients showing greater bias scores than controls with a marginally significant valence by group interaction ( F (2,123) = 3.08, p = .05).

To resolve the cTBS × Effort level × Trial interaction, we computed separate MGLMs for each effort level: For high effort, but not for medium and low effort, we observed a marginally significant negative effect of trial, β = −1.70, t (71) = 1.95, p = .05, BF 10 = 3.50, suggesting that in the control group participants were less willing to choose the effortful option with increasing time‐on‐task.

Although the effects of soil depth and N fertilization on SRL were not significant, their interactive effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.05; Table 6 ), indicating that N fertilization affected SRL differently at different soil depths.

The marginally significant interaction effect between education and severity, β = 0.57, t (1171) = 1.95, p = 0.05, was also tested.

The results showed that only feedback type was marginally significant for the main effects, F (1,44) = 4.057, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.084.

On the emotions scores, lesions on the upper limbs caused marginally significant lower scores compared to lesions in the face/head (p = 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found as far as lesions on the lower limbs or trunk compared to face/head located lesions.

This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.77, df = 1, P = 0.05).

This model provided an acceptable fit to the data [χ 2 (146) = 326.42, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.08] but there was a marginally significant difference in model fit between the two models [Δχ 2 (21) = 32.42, p = 0.05].

During preparation, a very small, but significant, activity increase was found within PMv ( p = 0.002), and a marginally significant increase within PMd ( p = 0.050; Fig. 4 b ), suggesting large variability across participants.

The beverage effect on the “high” estimates was still marginally significant after the task, F (1,21) = 3.6, p < 0.05.

Experiment 1: Comparing the life histories of animals inside and outside field cages There was a marginally significant difference in the multivariate phenotype of Daphnia magna individuals reared inside and outside of the cages (perMANOVA: F 1, 58 = 1.746, p = .05, Figure 2b ).