“marginally significant”

We observed a weak and marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.16, R a d j 2 = 0 . 02 , t = 1.97, p = .05), which was driven by the shape word condition ( r = 0.24, R a d j 2 = 0 . 05 , t = 2.11, p < .05).

For measures of latency noise, correlations between RT and TOJ tasks and between TOJ and 2xSJ tasks were marginally significant (one-tailed bootstrap p < 0.05).

One may argue a marginally significant survival improvement ( P = 0.05) amounted to a remarkable 11-month prolongation.

Age shows a marginally significant trend, with younger professionals slightly more likely to have adequate knowledge (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–1.00; p = 0.050).

However, in interrupted time-series analyses, there were no significant COVID-19-related impact on the monthly numbers of patients ( p = 0.33) or visits ( p = 0.53) related to affective disorders, but a marginally significant association with a lower number of patients ( p = 0.05), but not visits ( p = 0.21), related to anxiety disorders.

However, we observed a marginally significant difference between leaf surfaces (χ 2 = 3.82, df = 1, P = 0.05).

Residence was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.836, p = 0.050), with rural residents showing slightly higher adherence (84.2%) than urban ones (81.6%).

There was a marginally significant difference between group means F (1, 32) = 4.05, p = .05, η p 2 = .11, with deaf children performing worse than hearing children.

As shown in Table 5 , there was a marginally significant interaction effect of Performance self-talk and Social-behavior strategy on the prediction of writing anxiety at T1 ( b = −0.10, p < 0.05).

The Egger test for funnel plot asymmetry was marginally significant (intercept 0.66, P =.05).

48 Additionally, there was a marginally significant reduction in ventricular arrhythmias with carvedilol versus metoprolol (22% vs 26%, HR=0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.00, p=0.050).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of mood on the number of deep ideas, F (1, 115) = 3.86, p =.05, η2 = 0.03, and a significant effect of presentation format, F (1, 115) = 4.27, p =.04, η2 = 0.04.

There were marginally significant differences ( p < 0.05) between CHIKV copy numbers in mosquitoes fed first with ZIKV and then with CHIKV compared to mosquitoes exposed to an uninfectious blood meal first (UC vs.

Compared to the TDCs, the mean R 2 value of the whole cortex in patients with ASD was significantly reduced ( p = 0.048, Figure 3 A), and decreases in R 2 values in SMN, CCN, and ventral attention network (VAN) were marginally significant ( p < 0.05, FDR correction failed).

Response efficacy had a significant positive impact ( β = 0.470, p <0.001); perceived threat also exerted a significant positive effect ( β = 0.289, p <0.001); response cost showed a significant negative influence ( β = −0.156, p <0.001); and self-efficacy exhibited a marginally significant positive association ( β = 0.092, p <0.05).

Marginally significant values ( p > 0.05 and < 0.08) are in plain text and are marked with an * .

When 6-month AHI was also included as a covariate in the model, the difference in TNF-a remained marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

Results from the meta-analysis were significant for any migraine (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99) and marginally significant for MA (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00; p = 0.05).

Across provenances, seedling performance tended to decline as annual precipitation at the planting site exceeded that at the provenance origin (ΔPRT; β ≈ −1.26), although this effect was marginally significant ( p ≈ 0.05, Fig. 3 ).

HPA showed a marginally significant positive association with anxiety in the fully adjusted model (OR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.21, P=0.050).

Group-specific analyses showed that this relationship was driven primarily by the expert group, which demonstrated a significant medium positive correlation (ρ = 0.4006, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.2617, 0.5233]), and the Gemini group, which showed a marginally significant correlation (ρ = 0.3121, p = 0.050, 95% CI [0.0007, 0.5684]).

For insulin (panel A), there was a significant main effect of adolescent exposure (F (1,18) = 12.6; p = 0.002), no main effect of diet (F (1,18) = 2.1; p = 0.15) and a marginally significant interaction (F (1,18) = 4.1; p = 0.05).

However, the interaction between land use and antibiotic was marginally significant (χ 2 =9.6, df=4, P =0.05).

Levels of sPD-1, sPD-L1, sLAG-3, sICOS, sGITR and sCD86 were significantly higher in mismatch repair deficient tumors (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney U test) and difference in sGITRL was marginally significant (p=0.050, Mann-Whitney U test).

The results show that, except for mean fixation duration—which reached a marginally significant level ( p = 0.050)—no significant differences were found between the two proficiency groups in first fixation duration, total fixation duration, total fixation count, mean pupil diameter, or mean eyelid aperture.