Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally non-significant”

1,494 sentences · 1,494 papers · 1,908 search hits before verification

In the literature

marginally non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
Patients with an increase in BI during geriatric hospital treatment had a marginally non-significant lower number of uncompensated problems (5.6 vs. 7.2; p = 0.06) than those with no change or decrease in BI.
marginally non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
Although there appeared to be some indication of sex-specific differences in Gpc3 expression in liver ( Table S2 ), this was largely due to a marginally non-significant sex-by-genotype interaction in β-actin levels used to normalise Gpc3 expression ( p = 0.06), which generated the pattern shown in Table S2 ; untransformed liver Gpc3 levels did not show a significant sex-by-genotype interaction ( p = 0.13).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0601.2× alpha
Marginally non-significant evidence was observed for a positive relationship with K. pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (β = 0.172; 95%CI = −0.008; 0.351; p = 0.060), and a negative relationship with MRSA (β = −0.172; 95%CI = −0.350; 0.006; p = 0.059) and E. coli resistant to aminopenicillins (β = −0.219; 95%CI = −0.449; 0.012; p = 0.063).
marginally non-significantP = 0.061.2× alpha
The full linear model including all interaction terms revealed that 2 loci, Clock r1 and Creb1 , showed a marginally non-significant ( P = 0.06 in both cases) tendency for sex-specific effects on FGR (details not shown), while the phenotypic effects of the other loci were far from significance (all P values > 0.26, details not shown for brevity).
marginally non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
Subgroup analyses showed: Chinese populations had a significant positive association (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 2.19–3.03, I 2 = 61%, p < 0.001), while the association in American populations was marginally non-significant (OR = 2.80, 95% CI: 0.94–8.31, I 2 = 71%, p = 0.06); Prospective cohorts (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.27–3.59, I 2 = 83%, p = 0.004) and retrospective cohorts (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.31–3.28, I 2 = 23%, p < 0.001) both showed significant positive associations, with no significant between-subgroup differences ( p = 0.66); Large-sample studies (≥5,000 participants) had a stable, significant association (OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 2.41–2.88, I 2 = 12%, p < 0.001), while small-sample studies (<5,000 participants) also showed a significant association (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.41–5.47, I 2 = 78%, p = 0.003).
marginally non-significantp=0.06001.2× alpha
During the steady state portion of the flight, P O2 in normoxia (steady state EMM = 42.30 ± 2.49 mmHg) dropped slightly so moderate hypoxia (steady state EMM = 33.59 ± 3.40 mmHg) was marginally non-significant (t = −2.373, p=0.0600) while P O2 in severe hypoxia (steady state EMM = 29.61 ± 4.21) remained significantly different from normoxia (t = −2.881, p=0.0152).