“marginally non-significant”

There was a marginally non-significant trend that the interaction term Treatment x Maternal body condition predicted offspring sex ratio (Pri: z = 1.86, P = 0.06, Sec: z = 1.80, P = 0.07).

3A ), although courses with a lab spent slightly more time on the topic (marginally non-significant p = 0.060) ( Table 3 ).

The overall types of AMPs showed differences among the three families, but these differences were marginally non-significant (ANOVA F = 6.094, P = 0.061), and species in the Ranidae family produced more AMPs than did species in the other families.

Thus, the mean values of divergence of the regulatory region controlling the expression of Prm 2 show a significant association with sperm swimming velocity (VSL, r 2 =0.659, p =0.02; figure 4 ), and a marginally non-significant association with LIN ( r 2 =0.4448, p =0.061).

This analysis largely confirms the original results in Table 2 , except for nausea, which is now marginally non-significant ( P = .061).

There was a marginally non-significant interaction between animation and positive expressions (F(1, 112) = 3.591, p = 0.061, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.031), suggesting a trend where animation and positive expression might jointly influence the amount of visual attention allocated to the virtual humans.

The negative association between light PA and TIAT (β=-0.003; P = 0.040), along with the positive association between daily minutes in SB and TIAT (β=0.003; P = 0.031), became both marginally non-significant after controlling for CRF (β=-0.003; P = 0.061 and β=0.003; P = 0.052, respectively).

Indirect reciprocity also had a positive effect, but this was marginally non-significant (β 2 =2.69, p value =0.061, CI 95% :[-0.13, 5.50]).

5 ) and a marginally non-significant effect of sex (least squares mean ± 95% confidence interval: males: 0.019 ± 0.005, females: 0.025 ± 0.004; F 1,31 = 3.77, P = 0.061).

Nurses working 1–4 shifts/month had significantly higher engagement than the 5–9 shifts group ( p = 0.008), though the difference compared with ≥ 10 shifts was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.061).

2.5 cm and 2.5 cm, respectively; p < 0.05) (Table 4 ).After adjusting for twin pregnancy and gestational duration, the ANCOVA model was marginally non-significant for the overall model, F [ 4 , 25 ] = 2.588, p = 0.061, explaining approximately 18% of the variance in SPL (Adjusted R2=0.180).

Individuals surviving pond drying experienced a marginally non-significant increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio (df = 1, 99; χ 2 = 3.499, p = 0.061), whereas those that survived predators did not alter their GSH/GSSG ratio at all (df = 1, 99; χ 2 = 2.168, p = 0.140; Table 1 ).

The fairness × group interaction effect was marginally non-significant ( F (2,160) = 2.55, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.034).

In this study, lens wearers blinked more frequently than controls, although the difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.061).

A model with all 4 factors as main effects and with 2 interactions (SITE × YEAR and SEX × AGE) plus P/A heligmosomids converged but was marginally non-significant (GLM with negbin errors, BFM for oxyuroid nematodes + P/A of heligmosomids, LR 1,904 = 3.505, P = 0.061).

The marginal mean slope of peak date of passage for males of the Sahel group was significantly different from zero (-0.7 ± 0.2 days per year, p = 0.002) and marginally non-significant in males of the Tropical group (-0.3 ± 0.2 days per year, p = 0.061).

= 1, p = 0.021); (ii) juveniles showed a marginally non-significant tendency to learn faster than adults ( Fig 3B ; Χ 2 = 3.5, d.f. = 1, p = 0.061); but there was no effect of (iii) sex ( Fig 3C ; Χ 2 = 0.4, d.f. = 1, p = 0.547), or of (iv) exploration score on learning rate in the field ( Fig 3D ; Χ 2 = 0.97, d.f. = 1, p = 0.326) (see also Tables B-E in S2 Text ).

Marital status showed a marginally non-significant trend (p=0.061), where married women had a slightly higher mean score (38.90, SD=6.64) compared to divorced/widowed women (36.50, SD=9.20).

In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), the association remained marginally non-significant in the total population (OR: 0.932, 95% CI: 0.865–1.003, p = 0.061) but was still significant in females (OR: 0.894, 95% CI: 0.811, 0.984, p = 0.023).

For Insulin-DI, the standard linear model showed a marginally non-significant trend (OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 0.998–1.05, p = 0.061).

There was a marginally non-significant association of FRi and the primary endpoint, presented per 10 mL/m 2 s increase in the supplemental Table 1 (HR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.91-1.00, p = 0.061).

antibody-positive and young) were marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0612 and p = 0.0627, respectively).

As expected, the males had longer tarsi than the females, but the difference was marginally non-significant (linear model: β male ± se = 0.99 ± 0.47; F 1,10 = 4.41, p = 0.062).

Soft tissue health also improved, though the change was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.062), and no soreness or inflammation was reported.

The rate of pancreatitis was higher when the pancreatic duct was catheterized two or more times, although this difference was marginally non-significant statistically (5.4% vs 2.5%; P = 0.062).