Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally non-significant”

1,494 sentences · 1,494 papers · 1,908 search hits before verification

In the literature

marginally non-significantp = .061.2× alpha
This difference was significant in the inhibition/control dual-task condition, G 2 = 14.93, p < .001, and in the updating/control dual-task condition, G 2 = 11.90, p < .001, but was marginally non-significant in the single-task condition, G 2 = 3.44, p = .06, and it was not significant in the shifting/control dual-task condition, G 2 (1) = 2.05, ns .
marginally non-significantP = 0.061.2× alpha
Mean torpor frequency (i.e., percentage of days on which torpor was used) was 58.3 ± 18.1% (N = 122 bouts) in the deep shade treatment, 54.8 ± 20.3% (N = 124 bouts) in the partial shade treatment, and 27.8 ± 28.1% (N = 51 bouts) in the full sun treatment, with variation among the three treatments being marginally non-significant (LMM, F 1, 16 = 3.98, P = 0.06).
marginally non-significantP = 0.061.2× alpha
The number of alleles ( n a ) and the allelic richness ( R S ) of the low altitude class (<2,300 m a.s.l.: n a = 39 and R S = 5.57) were lower than those of the intermediate altitude class (2,300-2,800 m a.s.l.: n a = 50 and R S = 7.10; difference marginally non-significant, P = 0.06, Wilcoxon signed-paired rank test, after Bonferroni correction) and of the high altitude class (>2800 m a.s.l.: n a = 57, P = 0.06, and R S = 7.40, P = 0.09).
marginally non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
Examining correlations at the between-subject level, there was a significant correlation between participants’ running fitness and their average dose ( r = 0.52, p < 0.01), and the correlation between running fitness and the total number of runs in the study period was marginally non-significant ( r = 0.31, p = 0.06).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0601.2× alpha
Marginally non-significant evidence was observed for a positive relationship with K. pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (β = 0.172; 95%CI = −0.008; 0.351; p = 0.060), and a negative relationship with MRSA (β = −0.172; 95%CI = −0.350; 0.006; p = 0.059) and E. coli resistant to aminopenicillins (β = −0.219; 95%CI = −0.449; 0.012; p = 0.063).
marginally non-significantP = 0.061.2× alpha
When comparing our set of DE genes with candidate sexually antagonistic genes identified from past studies, we found moderate and marginally non-significant overlap with candidates identified in Innocenti and Morrow (2010 ; Fisher's exact P = 0.06; supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online) and statistically significant overlap with genes enriched in candidate sexually antagonistic SNPs identified by Ruzicka et al.