“marginally non-significant”

For pollen tube growth rate we found a similar trend that the identity of cultivar/feral population was important, but the effect was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.059; Table 2 , Fig 2B ).

There was a marginally non-significant difference between treatment groups during t 1 ( β (SE) = 4.67 (2.24), t = 2.08, P = 0.059), while no difference was observed between treatment groups during t 2 and t 3 ( t 2 : β (SE) = 0.64 (1.99), t = 0.32, P = 0.755; t 3 : β (SE) = –0.03 (2.07), t = 0.02, P = 0.987; Fig 1a ).

This reduction in social parasites was marginally non-significant (one-sided t -test, p = 0.059, df = 2, t = −2.65).

However, RSV co-infection with human metapneumovirus (HMPV) was most frequently detected in the 6 to 14 years group, though the difference was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.059).

We found a small, marginally non-significant positive period × time interaction ( β = 0.002, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.004], t (49) = 1.946, p =.059), a non-significant effect of time ( β = −0.001, 95% CI [−0.003, 0.000], t (49) = −1.605, p =.117), and a significant negative effect of period ( β = −0.073, 95% CI [−0.135, −0.012], t (49) = −2.402, p =.021) (Supplementary Table S6, Figure S4).

However, the differences in responses elicited by the four active compounds were marginally non-significant at the 30 μM screening concentration ( F (3,30) = 2.76; p = 0.059; Figures 5B,C ).

Breeding success and productivity were also lower for birds based on field monitoring estimates compared to using field-corrected GPS data, although these differences were marginally non-significant (success: X 2 = 1.22, d.f. = 2, p = 0.059; productivity: X 2 = 0.79, d.f. = 2, p = 0.077; figure 2 b , c ).

In this reduced dataset, Pagel’s lambda is greater than 1, but this result is marginally non-significant (λ = 1.21, P = 0.059).

The weight of the host had a marginally non-significant effect on the probability of reproduction (Wald χ 2 = 3.58, d.f. = 1, p = 0.059; note that p -value estimates from logistic analyses are not exact, [ 86 ]): the trend was that the probability of success declined as host size increased ( Figure 1 ).

A two-factor ANOVA with the between-subject factors “modality” and “processing” revealed a marginally non-significant interaction of both conditions [ F (2, 85) = 2.936, p = 0.059, η = 0.065].

Furthermore, there was a similar but marginally non-significant difference between the two groups in functional well-being score ( p = 0.059) and FACT-HEP total score ( p = 0.061) in the second month ( Fig. 5 ).

aPTT was marginally non-significant in the final model ( P = .059).

The baseline UI stage was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.059), while age, BMI, and time to rehabilitation were not statistically significant predictors. 4.

Intermediate class was found to have the highest AHI, although the overall difference between classes was marginally non-significant ( p =0.059).

We included a year of sampling as a fixed effect in all models and found that all the immune traits varied significantly between years (LRT P < 0.001), apart from IL-4 where the year was marginally non-significant ( χ 2 = 7.43, Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 3, P = 0.059).

There was a marginally non-significant Position x Contrast interaction effect on latency (Fig. 3c and Table 1 , model 4; Position x Contrast interaction effect: LRT = 3.56, p = 0.0592).

erythroleucus was retained—with a marginally non-significant effect (LRT = 3.551; p = 0.0594)—in the most parsimonious model explaining variance in M. symmetrica prevalence , indicating a higher level of parasitism in house mice coexisting with native rodent populations.

We initially conducted all analyses both with and without the three morphological covariates, but only present the models including them because results were extremely similar—the only qualitative difference was a slight change from statistical significance ( p = 0.0158) to marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0596) for the interaction term in the model for male lateral displays.

1.2|1.3), with the difference in rates being either significant ( p = 0.016; “Supermatrix-ITS-like” tree) or only marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0599; “Supermatrix-ITS-like” tree).

When comparing our set of DE genes with candidate sexually antagonistic genes identified from past studies, we found moderate and marginally non-significant overlap with candidates identified in Innocenti and Morrow (2010 ; Fisher's exact P = 0.06; supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online) and statistically significant overlap with genes enriched in candidate sexually antagonistic SNPs identified by Ruzicka et al.

A high frequency of CN8 (mCAF-rich) was marginally non-significant as a prognostic factor for a higher probability of recurrence ( p = 0.06; HR (95%CI) = 4.54 (0.94–22.01); Supplementary Fig. 4 A) and distant metastasis ( p = 0.07; HR (95%CI) = 3.46 (0.91–13.10); Supplementary Fig. 4B) in the Cox regression model.

A marginally non-significant positive correlation was also noted for Black patients ( ρ = 0.27, p = 0.06).

14% (40/286)), albeit with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).

However, there was a marginally non-significant negative relationship between RMR and Age (-0.12 ± 0.06, t = 1.91, p = 0.06); Age was therefore kept in the main analysis with personality.

A similar pattern was observed in the DLPFC, although results in neuritic plaque-positive participants were marginally non-significant (p = 0.06).