“marginally non-significant”

First, the association between prolonged device use and headache became marginally non-significant (p=0.058), although the OR remained positive (2.01), similar to the complete case analysis (2.27).

As shown in Table 3 , cognitive function had a marginally non-significant total effect on cachexia (OR=1.081, p=0.058).

trichiura (prevalence from 19.4% to 11.7%, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.73, p = 0.0040) and a marginally non-significant reduction in odds of infection of Strongyloides spp (prevalence from 4.3% to 1.6%, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.89, p = 0.058) in the IVM-1 arm ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

All linear regressions of the effects of P max on the number of selection candidate loci and significant trait-locus associations showed negative, albeit marginally non-significant relationships ( Dfdist global comparisons r 2 = 0.315, P = 0.058; BayeScan global comparisons r 2 =0.155, P = 0.148; MatSAM r 2 = 0.239, P = 0.09; all P values one-tailed: Figure 4 ).

The interaction between information type and array size was also marginally non-significant ( b = 1.23, SE = 0.65, Z = 1.90, p = 0.058).

Theta modulation index at 6 months , was a marginally non-significant positive predictor of the Bayley-III Cognitive Index scores (standardized β = 0.24, 95 % CI [-0.01, 0.49], t = 1.929, p = 0.058).

This fluctuation across time, which was independent of the sampling site, was only marginally non-significant ( month effect: F 1,25 = 3.94, p = 0.058, site effect: F 3,23 = 0.32, p = 0.81).

After first accounting for the sterile soil biodiversity level, the residual effect of microbial asynchrony on plant diversity and litter decomposition stability remained significant (p=0.036 and 0.048, respectively) and the effect on litter decomposition stability was marginally non-significant (p=0.058, Supplementary file 1 – table 9).

However, the Chi-squared test comparing age groups revealed a marginally non-significant result ( P = 0.058), which could be explained by the limited sample size and the method of age-group categorization.

The analysis revealed a significant main effect of time ( F (2,58) = 63.73; p < .001) suggesting overall improvements across time points, and marginally non-significant interaction between time and group ( F (2,58) = 2.99; p = .058).

There was also a negative but marginally non-significant association between males’ colour volume and body mass ( p = 0.058), with larger males being less colored than in smaller species.

Conversely, the war period was associated with significantly lower odds of 30-day mortality compared to the non-war period (OR = 0.14, 95%CI [0.02–0.69], p = 0.026), with a similar trend observed for in-hospital mortality, although the latter was marginally non-significant (OR = 0.13, 95%CI [0.01–0.91], p = 0.058).

The greatest number of plants with eggs was recorded for the untreated control, that did not differ from azadirachtin ( p = 0.504) and CT ( p = 0.103); the difference with mineral oil was just marginally non-significant ( p = 0.058).

The moderating effect of community leaders on socio-environmental factors (Leader × SENV) was marginally non-significant (β = 0.327, p = .058).

For the medulla, TBV had a significant positive effect on volume ( F 1,26 =11.44, P =0.002), while the effect of age was marginally non-significant ( F 1,26 =3.93, P =0.058) and HCV had no significant effect ( F 1,26 =0.0010, P =0.975) ( Fig. 6A ).

Marginally non-significant bias was found for DBP (−2.2 ± 8.0 [−4.5, 0.1] mmHg, P = 0.058; R 2 : 0.66; ±10/±15 mmHg agreements: 78%, 96%).

(89%; N = 98) fragment survival being marginally non-significant ( χ 2 (1, N = 544) = 3.59, p = 0.058).

None of the F CT values were significant, however, the 4-groups arrangement was marginally non-significant ( p -value = 0.0583).

domestica cadavers (χ 2 = 32.5794, df = 1, P < 0.001), while sex of the flies was marginally non-significant (χ 2 = 3.5836, df = 1, P = 0.0584).

Hypotension was significantly increased (RR 2.67; 95% CI 1.45–4.92; p = 0.0112; I2 = 0%), with leave-one-out sensitivity analyses yielding stable estimates ranging from RR 2.33 to 2.86, though omitting Laffin 2025 rendered the result marginally non-significant (RR 2.66; 95% CI 0.93–7.56; p = 0.0587).

The two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between pre-intervention timing and DP dose ( p = 0.0003), while the main effect of dose was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0589) and the main effect of pre-intervention was not significant ( p = 0.1581).

Urban residence showed a marginally non-significant association ( p = 0.059) with smaller networks, suggesting potential differences in social network structure between urban and rural populations, though findings are inconsistent with some studies reporting enhanced urban social networks [ 33 ].

However, the differences in responses elicited by the four active compounds were marginally non-significant at the 30 μM screening concentration ( F (3,30) = 2.76; p = 0.059; Figures 5B,C ).

For pollen tube growth rate we found a similar trend that the identity of cultivar/feral population was important, but the effect was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.059; Table 2 , Fig 2B ).

There was a marginally non-significant difference between treatment groups during t 1 ( β (SE) = 4.67 (2.24), t = 2.08, P = 0.059), while no difference was observed between treatment groups during t 2 and t 3 ( t 2 : β (SE) = 0.64 (1.99), t = 0.32, P = 0.755; t 3 : β (SE) = –0.03 (2.07), t = 0.02, P = 0.987; Fig 1a ).