“marginally non-significant”

There was a marginally non-significant trend towards lower viral loads in those with BCP double mutations (1762/1764, p = 0.06).

Funnel plot asymmetry evaluation using the Egger’s test revealed significant asymmetry (t = 3.58; p -value < 0.002), indicating potential publication bias, while Begg’s test yielded a marginally non-significant result (z = 1.87; p -value > 0.06), suggesting weaker evidence against funnel plot symmetry (Funnel plot in Supplementary Figure S1A ).

microti , but the correlation was marginally non-significant (t = 2.2, P = 0.06) ( Fig. 3 ).

Although there appeared to be some indication of sex-specific differences in Gpc3 expression in liver ( Table S2 ), this was largely due to a marginally non-significant sex-by-genotype interaction in β-actin levels used to normalise Gpc3 expression ( p = 0.06), which generated the pattern shown in Table S2 ; untransformed liver Gpc3 levels did not show a significant sex-by-genotype interaction ( p = 0.13).

As indicated by a marginally non-significant three way interaction (lme: p = 0.06) of original soil biota community (SB), Agriotes training (AP1) and Agriotes presence (AP2), the positive effect of the presence of Agriotes larvae with soil biota community SEG 37 was lost when the soil was already Agriotes trained.

There are several potential explanations for our finding that SP expression was weakly increased, in addition to the possibility that the marginally non-significant result ( P = 0.06) arose by chance.

There was a significant interaction between the group and time for the multivariate test, Wilks Lambda = 0.93, F (2, 94) = 3.60, p = 0.03, partial η 2 = 0.07, and a marginally non-significant interaction effect for the univariate test - F (2, 190) = 2.83, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.03.

None of the other effects in the adjusted model was statistically significant, although there were marginally non-significant trends for effects of sex ( F 1,56 = 3.81, p = 0.06, males higher, estimated marginal means±se: M 29.68±1.79, F 25.66±1.59) and local origin ( F 1,56 = 3.64, p = 0.06, non-locals higher, estimated marginal means±se: local 25.12±1.22, non-local 30.22±2.38).

However, there was a marginally non-significant negative relationship between RMR and Age (-0.12 ± 0.06, t = 1.91, p = 0.06); Age was therefore kept in the main analysis with personality.

Agouti squirrels from city sites trended towards having fewer OTUs than agouti squirrels from rural sites, albeit this effect was marginally non-significant ( β = 59.88 ± 31.17 SE , t = − 1.92, p = 0.06).

Red-flowered populations clustered strongly and had a significantly different pollinating fauna to yellow- ( R = 1.00, p = 0.03) and pink-flowered populations ( R = 0.54, p = 0.03) and a marginally non-significant difference to white-flowered populations ( R = 0.39, p = 0.06), while the fauna in yellow-flowered populations was significantly different to that in pink-flowered populations ( R = 0.46, p = 0.03).

There was a marginally non-significant difference in mindfulness scores between the two groups ( p = 0.06).

Conw and Poss also caused height reduction, but marginally non-significant (0.05 < p < 0.06).

A similar pattern was observed in the DLPFC, although results in neuritic plaque-positive participants were marginally non-significant (p = 0.06).

Considering the results for the predictors of MRS total score, agreeableness (1.13 [0.21], p < 0.001), openness (–0.33 [0.11], p = 0.004) and extraversion (–0.83 [0.37], p = 0.03) demonstrated significance ( Table 4 ), while conscientiousness was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).

Significant reductions in the rates of unplanned re-presentations were seen in EDs with fast track (IRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92, p=0.006) and those with aged care liaison models (IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96, p=0.023), with a marginally non-significant increase in re-presentations associated with the presence of a Nurse Educator (IRR 1.22, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.50, p=0.060) (see online supplementary file ).

saxesenii , whose abundance tended to be higher in Georgia than in Italy, although the difference was only marginally non-significant (GLMER; Georgia: Z = −15.73, p = < 0.001; Italy: Z = 1.89, p = 0.06; Georgia vs.

We observed marginally non-significant differences (between-sessions’ effects) in mean EES scores of all three weeks between the exercise sessions ( p = 0.06, p η 2 : 0.09), where the participants reported higher enjoyment in INT80 sessions compared with CE70 sessions ( p = 0.06), with no differences between INT80 vs.

Haplotype associations ( table 6 ) using the 4 CYP4F2 SNPs (rs1272, rs3093158, rs2072902, and rs2108622) indicated significant associations with haplotype GGTC (p = 0.007) and marginally non-significant associations with haplotype GACT (p = 0.06).

14% (40/286)), albeit with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).

Statistical tests indicated that their differences were marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).

During Trial 2, growth rate was affected by initial mass ( F 1,41 = 27.8, P <0.0001) and air temperature ( F 1,34 = 37.1, P <0.0001) but the effect of rainfall was marginally non-significant ( F 1,41 = 3.9, P = 0.06).

52.44 ± 8.74 years), with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.06).

The heterogeneity among studies was marginally non-significant ( I 2 = 19%, Q E = 20, P = 0.06).

Contestants that ‘promised’ to split were more likely to do so (GLM: Wald χ 2 = 21.10, P<0.001), but their promises only had a marginally non-significant effect upon increasing the likelihood that their opponents split (GLM: Wald χ 2 = 3.53, P = 0.060).