Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally non-significant”

1,494 sentences · 1,494 papers · 1,908 search hits before verification

In the literature

marginally non-significantp=0.0561.1× alpha
In the 0–90 day window, however, additional adjustment for age slightly strengthened the association and improved statistical significance (OR=1.056, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.108, p=0.023), compared with the marginally non-significant estimate without age adjustment (OR=1.046, 95% CI 0.999 to 1.095, p=0.056) ( online supplemental table S5 ).
marginally non-significantP = 0.0561.1× alpha
Whilst there was a marginally non-significant positive link between packed blood cell volume (PCV) and PC1 I ( F 1,76.7 = 3.77, P = 0.056) this was principally due to a strong relation of PCV to TLR9-mediated responses ( F 1,80.9 = 11.41; P = 0.001) but not responses mediated through other receptors (all P > 0.05).
marginally non-significantP = 0.0561.1× alpha
A General Linear Model with (1) mean heart rate as a continuous predictor, (2) snout-vent length and body mass at birth as dependent variables, and (3) embryo positioning and clutch of origin as categorical predictors yielded a marginally non-significant effect of embryo positioning F 2, 38 = 3.11; P = 0.056—see Fig. 5 ).
marginally non-significantp = .0561.1× alpha
Psychological and subjective wellbeing: Sterling Children’s wellbeing scale (SCWBS) Positive emotional state – SCWBS: PES The 2*3 ANCOVA analysis revealed a non-significant effect of time, F (1, 104) = 0.090, p = .765, ηp 2 = .001, a marginally non-significant effect of group, F (2, 104) = 2.956, p = .056, ηp 2 = .054, and a non-significant time * group interaction effect, F (2, 104) = 0.165, p = .848, ηp 2 = .001, and a non-significant time * pre-treatment PES interaction F(1, 104) = 0.115, p = .735, ηp 2 = .001.
marginally non-significantP =0.0561.1× alpha
Expected parasitism based on a binary regional food web was a marginally non-significant predictor of observed parasitism ( z =1.9, P =0.056, with a partial regression coefficient of 1.9 (s.e.=0.99) for binary data ( Supplementary Table 8a ), compared with 2.3 (s.e.=0.84) for quantitative data ( Supplementary Table 3 ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0561.1× alpha
A marginally non-significant reduction was noted in 17-OH progesterone concentrations of 677TT carriers (0.78 ± 0.06-fold, exact p = 0.056) and no differences were observed between 677TT and 677CC individuals of the Group-400 for FF concentrations of the other measured steroids ( Fig. 2 ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0571.1× alpha
Applying both restrictions the effect became marginally non-significant (coefficients=-6.65 ± 3.49, χ 2 1 = 3.62, p = 0.057) Decomposing first year survival into summer and winter survival indicated that the effect of offspring inbreeding coefficient on first year survival is driven by its effect on winter survival (coefficient=-15.2 ± 3.43, χ 2 1 = 19.6, p < 0.001, table 3 ).
Inbreeding depression in red deer calves.
BMC Evol Biol · 2011 · PMC3226574