Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally non-significant”

1,494 sentences · 1,494 papers · 1,908 search hits before verification

In the literature

marginally non-significantp < 0.0551.1× alpha
The latency time of diaspore discovery by ants did not differ among partially defleshed and intact fruits ( t test = 1.01, df = 19, p = 0.32, Fig 5A ) and the difference between the number of ant species attending to piles of partially defleshed and intact fruits was low and marginally non-significant ( t test = 2.04, df = 19, p < 0.055, Fig 5B ).
marginally non-significantp =0.0551.1× alpha
Further, SL was associated with a lower sural NCV (B=−7.0 [95% CI −13.0, −1.1], p =0.021). After including sural NCV in the multivariable regression model, the association of SL with lower FA remained robust (B=−0.05 [95% CI −0.093, −0.007], p =0.023), although that of MH with FA was marginally non-significant (B=−0.042 [95% CI −0.085, 0.001], p =0.055) (Table 4 ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.05521.1× alpha
A mixed-model repeated measures ANOVA of the whole measure, combining the subscales of interest and enjoyment and value and usefulness, revealed a marginally non-significant effect of treatment ( p = 0.0552) with a significant effect of time ( p = 0.0004, η 2 = 0.163) and interaction ( p = 0.0006, η 2 = 0.152) ( Table 3 , Figure 1 ).
marginally non-significantP = 0.0561.1× alpha
Whilst there was a marginally non-significant positive link between packed blood cell volume (PCV) and PC1 I ( F 1,76.7 = 3.77, P = 0.056) this was principally due to a strong relation of PCV to TLR9-mediated responses ( F 1,80.9 = 11.41; P = 0.001) but not responses mediated through other receptors (all P > 0.05).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0561.1× alpha
The marginally non-significant trend for PINK1 ( p = 0.056)—the largest observed between-class difference (1.11 kcal/mol), with upstream SMO-targeting compounds showing somewhat stronger PINK1 engagement than downstream modulators—may reflect the structural features of SMO-binding scaffolds (morpholine rings, purine cores, aromatic amides) that are geometrically compatible with the PINK1 ATP-binding pocket, though this interpretation requires experimental biochemical confirmation.
marginally non-significantp = .0561.1× alpha
Psychological and subjective wellbeing: Sterling Children’s wellbeing scale (SCWBS) Positive emotional state – SCWBS: PES The 2*3 ANCOVA analysis revealed a non-significant effect of time, F (1, 104) = 0.090, p = .765, ηp 2 = .001, a marginally non-significant effect of group, F (2, 104) = 2.956, p = .056, ηp 2 = .054, and a non-significant time * group interaction effect, F (2, 104) = 0.165, p = .848, ηp 2 = .001, and a non-significant time * pre-treatment PES interaction F(1, 104) = 0.115, p = .735, ηp 2 = .001.
marginally non-significantp=0.0561.1× alpha
In the 0–90 day window, however, additional adjustment for age slightly strengthened the association and improved statistical significance (OR=1.056, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.108, p=0.023), compared with the marginally non-significant estimate without age adjustment (OR=1.046, 95% CI 0.999 to 1.095, p=0.056) ( online supplemental table S5 ).
marginally non-significantP = 0.0561.1× alpha
A General Linear Model with (1) mean heart rate as a continuous predictor, (2) snout-vent length and body mass at birth as dependent variables, and (3) embryo positioning and clutch of origin as categorical predictors yielded a marginally non-significant effect of embryo positioning F 2, 38 = 3.11; P = 0.056—see Fig. 5 ).