“marginal significance”

Genetically predicted brain HKDC1 protein abundance conferred a potentially protective effect against AD, with marginal significance in a meta‐analysis of two independent AD GWAS datasets (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.23–1.12; p = 0.07) (Figure 1A,B ).

The odds of this probable kleptoparasitism occurring at a cougar-killed elk site were 6.8 times greater than a cougar-killed deer site, again with marginal significance ( P = 0.07; SI Appendix , Table S6 and A ).

There was a marginal significance difference between the groups ( P = 0.07).

Despite the marginal significance of the difference, a superior OS was observed in the adjuvant CCRT group (5-year: 37.9% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.07), and in subgroup analysis, adjuvant CCRT increased the OS rate of patients with multiple N2 (p = 0.02).

Maternal education (OR: 1.56 (95% CI: 0.98–2.46); p = 0.057), was marginally significant and was included in the multivariate analysis; additionally low birth weight showed marginal significance (OR: 2.90 (95% CI: 1.12–7.44); p = 0.07), however the large number of missing values for birth weight (19.2% missing) and paternal age (10.9% missing) reduced the potential value as predictive factors and were therefore not included in the multivariate analysis.

A marginal significance (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.07) is indicated by a symbol in parentheses. 3.

Right medial superior frontal cortices showed higher HbR for recalling of the novel faces than same faces (ch 27, paired t-test, FDR corrected p-value = 0.07, marginal significance) while higher HbR for recalling of same faces was observed in left medial superior frontal cortex (ch 7, paired t-test, FDR corrected p-value = 0.07, marginal significance).

Among ecosystem types, these slopes were 1.44, 1.01, and 0.73 for coastal, meadow, and desert ecosystems, respectively, reaching a marginal significance (p=0.07, Table 2 ).

3.2 Laboratory experimental study: Mate choice In general, males had to increase the use of refuges at high temperatures (Tukey 34°C vs 38°C, P = 0.01; Table 4 , Fig 4 ), although with a high inter-individual variability (Male refuge use variance: 34°C = 11269, 36°C = 78654, 38°C = 107728), whereas females showed the same tendency but with only marginal significance (Tukey 34°C vs 38°C P = 0.07).

This choice of markers would also be consistent with a cursory analysis of illness severity showing that IL-1α and IL-8 in particular display a correlation of at least marginal significance ( p ≤ 0.07) or better with the general fatigue, physical fatigue and reduced activity components of the MFI (Additional file 1 : Table S4).

When sexes were separated, there were no statistically significant differences in any the indices measured, but the reduction of body weight in the male MNR fetuses reached marginal significance ( P = 0.07) ( Table 2 ).

Due to small sample size, the results with marginal significance (p≤0.07) were reported without adjusting for multiple comparison.

A marginal significance was observed for Ori when performed binocularly ( p = 0.07).

In fully adjusted models, among all participants, CRP had marginal significance as a mediator for SPS ( P =0.07), standing balance ( P =0.08), and was significant for the 4‐m walk ( P =0.04) (Figure 2 ).

For leukemia, high ( M = −1.76, SD = 1.76) and low ( M = −1.45, SD = 2.17) risk stimuli differed only at a marginal significance level, t (36) = 1.87, p = .07, partial η 2 = 0.09, indicating however an opposite polarity as observed for HIV risk (see Figure 3B ).

In people who have recently taken supplements, more weight changes have been observed, approaching the marginal significance ( P = 0.07).Similarly those subjects with recent supplement intake showed significantly more prevalence of obesity ( P = 0.04).

In addition, we found that a positive parental relationship predicted lower IGD symptoms at T2, with marginal significance ( P =.07).

5B ), and proliferating Ki-67 positive cells were decreased with marginal significance (P = 0.07; Fig. 5B ) in aCXCL16-treated group compared with the control group.

In contrast, a significant positive association between the level of PAI-1 and high adherence to white meat (β: 0.154, 95% CI: 0.021;0.283, p = 0.028) was observed in the crude model, but after adjustment, this association reached marginal significance (β: −0.340, 95% CI: −0.751;0.050, p = 0.070).

Case–control studies specifically showed an effect, but with marginal significance only (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.98–1.65, p = 0.07).

Merging the PN and wake groups and comparing it to the SS group revealed a marginal significance, indicating silent sleep resulted in more insight than the wake/PN groups combined ( p = 0.07, one-tailed).

However, the difference reached only a marginal significance ( P = 0.07).

Stress Induced hyperthermia showed that Chd7 +/Whi mutants had a lesser response (+1.42 °C ± 0.13 versus +1.84 °C ± 0.16 in mutants and controls, respectively) although reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.07).

3.2 Caecal worm intensity and reproduction The multiple linear regression analysis for average caecal worm count for individual bobwhite with seasonally averaged temperature and precipitation had a marginal significance (p = 0.07).

Changes in knee pain were associated with changes in perceptions of General Health with marginal significance (p = .07).