“marginal significance”

Positive objective response showed only marginal significance on LPFS (p=0.06) and PFS (p=0.07). 5.

AutoAb to PRKRA was modestly increased in SLE, with marginal significance ( P = 0.06, Figure 2 M).

With respect to pathological stage, no obvious biological gradient existed despite marginal significance ( P = 0.060).

Also, there was a marginal significance between MMR status and presence of lymphatic invasion (p=0.060).

32 Observational limb ROM assessments showed equivalence to goniometric measurements (upper/lower limb Z=-1.000/-1.342, P>0.05), while trunk evaluations retained goniometer-based protocols due to marginal significance (Z=-1.841, P=0.06).

There was no significant demographic difference between the group that engaged in detoxification vs the one who did not except for gender (marginal significance, p = .06).

However, when adjusting for body weight and kit, only rebound jump height remained predictive with marginal significance ( p = 0.06) ( R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.008).

Pathology of synchronous lesions according to the location and imaging factors of synchronous lesions With regard to the location of synchronous lesions to the index lesion, an ipsilateral location of a synchronous lesion showed marginal significance for correlating with a malignant pathology (P=0.06).

There were no statistically significant interaction terms in these models except marginal significance for an effect modification by region ( p = 0.06) for the first versus third tertiles of CK elevation and the LEPR Q223R polymorphism at four weeks.

Decrease in ApCoM VT range revealed a marginal significance in the High-Performance group ( p =.06), which also exhibited an overall tendency to decrease in the other linear variables from Set 1 to Set 2.

FD mice gained 18% more weight with a marginal significance ( p = 0.06) in accordance with a previous study [65] .

In an analysis of the relation to gender, involvement of neuropathic pain was seen more frequently in males than in females with a marginal significance ( p = 0.06) (Fig. 6 b).

The relationship between the 25OHD concentration and Mini-Mental Status Examination showed the positive correlation with a statistically marginal significance ( r = 0.299, p = 0.06).

Correlation analysis Frontal activity evoked by unpleasant pictures was positively correlated with HAMA total scores of the patients with BD and healthy controls ( r = 0.25, p < 0.02) and positively correlated with HAMD total scores, but with marginal significance ( r = 0.20, p = 0.06).

In Colon cancer, sex approached marginal significance (HR = 0.51, p = 0.06) but follow-up duration did not (HR = 0.98, p = 0.62), with moderate heterogeneity for follow-up.

Separate univariate ANOVAs indicated one significant ROI pair, in favor of the FTB group, RFOI-RLOC: F (1,53) = 5.32, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.09) and another ROI pair with marginal significance in favor of the FTB group, RIPS-RFOI: F (1,53) = 3.60, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.06).

In our study, biopsy Gleason score showed only marginal significance as a predictor of progression-free and cancer-specific survival in a univariate analysis (p=0.060, p=0.064, respectively).

However, a marginal significance ( p = 0.06) suggested that disease activity might influence fibrosis severity, as also reported by Bessissow et al.

The 6-wk mortality or transplantation rate was slightly lower in the urgent group but with marginal significance ( P = 0.060, Figure 2 ).

Although there were no statistical differences, several factors showed marginal significance between the two groups : diabetes mellitus ( p =0.060), hemoglobin level ( p =0.072), activated partial thromboplastin time ( p =0.074), and maximum width of hematoma ( p =0.075).

Overexpression of miR-194-3p significantly decreased cleavage of caspase 3 in PM 2.5 -CSS HBEpiCs (normalized value: 0.53±0.25 vs 1.00±0.00, p =0.024), but there was just a marginal significance in cleavage of caspase 9 (normalized value: 0.79±0.09 vs 1.00±0.00, p =0.060).

The observed interaction showed marginal significance when including IAT scores as a covariate in the model (B = −102.15, t (79) = −2.22, p = 0.06 Benjamini-Hochberg corrected, f 2 = 0.06, 95% CI [0.0, 0.22]), where Black participants with greater pro-black attitudes appearing to contribute most to this association (Figure S6A ).

After adjusting for confounders the riboflavin association change to marginal significance (β = 1.52; 95% CI 0.91–23.04, P = 0.06).

In K–M curves (Supplementary Figure 6), this trend demonstrated marginal significance ( P = 0.06).

For synonymous variants, more variants were found in Old T5 lines than in Young T1 and Peak T2 lines with marginal significance ( N = 8; X 2 = 6.25, p = .06).