“marginal significance”

Higher frequency of Vβ6‐6Jβ1‐3 rather than Vβ6‐6Jβ1‐6 was found in patients with NKX2‐1 copy number (CN) gain, with marginal significance ( p = .058), and they were significantly positively correlated (Cramer's V = 0.27, p = .007) (Figure 4A and Figure S7A) .

Although the TLR pathway had a marginal significance ( p = 0.058), it was more significant than the NLR pathway ( p = 0.91), while the RLR pathway showed the highest significance ( p = 0.024) of all the PRRs expressed in response to SAV-3 infection in TO-cells.

Results The mGluR5 density increased with marginal significance (+16%; P = 0.058) in the prefrontal cortex of FXS patients or carriers compared with matched healthy controls.

Progesterone receptor status was also associated with OS ( P =0.0107, Figure 2D ), whereas estrogen receptor status conferred an OS benefit with marginal significance ( P =0.0580, Figure 2B ).

The two‐way interaction approached marginal significance in ANOVA ( p = 0.058).

Results The correlational coefficient for the frequent items (DOG, CAT, ELEPAHANT, GIRAFFE, LION, TIGER) between patients and healthy controls was considerably higher at the follow-up (r=0.58) compared to that at base line (r=0.12), reaching a marginal significance (p=0.058).

2b ), Friedman’s rank test showed marginal significance in the alpha NF group ( χ 2 ( 2 ) = 5.69 , p = 0.058 ) .

The comparison between control and LibidoMax groups showed a marginal significance ( P = 0.058) for the left testis and strong significance ( P < 0.0001) for the right testis.

resting state), while the difference between music and resting state showed marginal significance ( P = 0.058).

The moderating effect was reduced to marginal significance ( p = .058) when only adjusting for daily time spent interacting with the partner (see Supplemental Tables S7–S12 ).

Longitude difference showed a weak negative correlation with MAD (partial correlation = -0.16, p < 0.01), whereas latitude difference had a weak correlation with marginal significance level (partial correlation = -0.12, p = 0.058).

Although cardiovascular disease has a marginal significance in the univariate analysis (p = 0.058), it was not included in the multivariate analysis due to the smaller number of endpoints.

Child-Pugh score also showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.058).

Yet, there was marginal significance for a higher level (mean ±SD) of continuously measured depressive symptoms in patients with compared to those without recurrent VTE (4.41±2.27 vs. 3.24±3.05, p = 0.058).

Results demonstrate marginal significance, Z = −1.57, P = 0.058, and suggest a potential trend increase in hospitalizations from 11% to 13% in 2019 and 2020, respectively.

Moreover, in the aspect of positive psychological emotions, the lower-grade students are obviously higher than the upper-grade students, and the second- and third-grade students present marginal significance, p = 0.058.

Although the overall reoperation rate was not significant between the groups, the rate of reoperation for recurrent significant AR was higher in the valve-sparing group with marginal significance (p=0.058).

After this procedure, a marginal significance of the right hippocampus was found ( P = 0.058, SVC corrected).

In the next set of models on belief in the vaccine, believing that the vaccine was safe for the baby was associated with increased odds of being vaccinated with marginal significance (p = 0.058) (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 0.97–7.39).

However, the main effects of EFB status and yard individually show only marginal significance (EFB: F = 2.438, P = 0.058; Yard: F = 1.127, P = 0.302), suggesting that while they may contribute to the model, their impact is not as pronounced as the virus species and its interactions.

Besides, a similar effect was also noted among different HR/ERBB2 subgroups ( P = 0.012) ( Figure 2A ), while marginal significance was achieved between patients with larger and smaller tumors ( P = 0.0581) ( Figure 2B ).

Despite the relatively small sample size of the chemotherapy-benefit validation cohort (56 patients with 13 recurrent events), the 10-gene chemotherapy-benefit signature also achieved marginal significance (log rank p value = 0.0583), indicating a promising trend that distinguishes 5-FU-based ACT-beneficial and non-beneficial groups in terms of survival outcomes.

The effect of during-outbreak-perceived risk remained significant in model 3 (AOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32; P = .0183), whereas the effect of altruistic acceptance of risk was slightly attenuated and of only marginal significance ( P = .0583). 4.

As compared with HER2 wild-type tumors, HER2 mut showed similar ORR (63% v 72%, OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.31 to 1.55]; P = .33), numerically shorter PFS (median: 9.4 v 12.1 months, HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.90 to 2.06]; P = .14), and significantly shorter OS (median: 23.7 v 34.4 months, HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.02 to 2.38]; P = .04; Figs 4 A- 4 C), reaching marginal significance in multivariate analysis after adjustment for covariates (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.98 to 2.38]; P = .059).

In cross-sectional analysis in 2017, we found that a higher dietary vitamin C intake was associated with a lower onset of airflow limitation at the 5-year follow up with marginal significance (5.29% vs. 1.67% for quartile 1 vs. quartile 4, p = 0.059, Supplementary Figure S1 ).