“marginal significance”

Besides, the unaffected arm exhibited significantly more preservation synergies (synergies resembling healthy patterns) than the affected arm in moderate (Placing 30 cm: Z(11) = -2.144, corrected p = 0.031, Rosenthal’s r = -0.646) and high complexity tasks (Z(11) = -2.558, corrected p = 0.028, Rosenthal’s r = -0.771), and fewer mutation synergies (synergies deviating from healthy patterns) with marginal significance (Placing 30 cm: Z(11) = -1.992, corrected p = 0.058, Rosenthal’s r = -0.600; Drinking: Z(11) = -2.070, corrected p = 0.058, Rosenthal’s r = -0.624).

In males, the non-risk haplotype tends to increase pressure pain thresholds, and it is overdominant to the risk haplotype, leading to increased pressure pain thresholds at a marginal significance level ( p = 0.058) (Fig. 1 ).

However, its marginal significance (p-value=0.058; WT vs.

A 2×2 repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant effect of probe order, F (1, 35) = 100, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.74, and a marginal significance of condition, F (1, 35) = 3.8, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.10.

Multivariable longitudinal analyses (Table 2 ) confirmed that high (vs low) state COVID-19 restrictions was associated with the likelihood of having ≥ 1 new non-COVID-19 death with marginal significance (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.10, p = 0.058), and significantly associated with a 15% increase in non-COVID-19 death count (IRR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.04–1.27, p = 0.007) among nursing homes with ≥ 1 new non-COVID-19 death.

76.9%), with the difference in warning signs reaching marginal significance ( P = 0.058).

In contrast, the control group did not show significant increments in scores of “recall” subscore of MMES ( P = 0.103) and backward digit span, although it may have marginal significance ( P = 0.058).

One-way ANOVA for accuracy indicated that the main effect in the SRC group reached marginal significance, F (9,126) = 1.9, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.12, but there was no significant difference in the post hoc tests ( p s > 0.05), while the main effect in the 2-back group was statistically significant, F (9,99) = 14.5, ε = 0.44, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.57.

Results The correlational coefficient for the frequent items (DOG, CAT, ELEPAHANT, GIRAFFE, LION, TIGER) between patients and healthy controls was considerably higher at the follow-up (r=0.58) compared to that at base line (r=0.12), reaching a marginal significance (p=0.058).

Results When grouped by sex, triclosan exposure was positively associated with the serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations in females with marginal significance (β = 0.066, p = 0.058).

Compared with the other antihypertensive agents after propensity score matching, CCB was associated with increased cancer risk (HR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.09; p = 0.017), whereas marginal significance was shown in association between ARB and a lower cancer risk (HR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00; p = 0.058). β-Blocker, TD, and ACEI showed no significant association with cancer risk ( p > 0.05).

The comparison between control and LibidoMax groups showed a marginal significance ( P = 0.058) for the left testis and strong significance ( P < 0.0001) for the right testis.

The incidence of COX-2 detected in carcinomas was significantly higher than that detected in benign tumours ( Table 1 , P <0.02) and higher with a marginal significance than that detected in borderline tumours ( Table 1 , P =0.058).

In the next set of models on belief in the vaccine, believing that the vaccine was safe for the baby was associated with increased odds of being vaccinated with marginal significance (p = 0.058) (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 0.97–7.39).

Regression analyses revealed that total protein content in pollen was negatively correlated with C:N ratio in pollen with marginal significance (p = 0.058, r 2 = 0.25).

The duration of practicing music did not contribute to the model fit ( χ 1 2 = 0.620 , p = 0.431 for partners; χ 1 2 = 0.877 , p = 0.349 for the interaction), with marginal significance for the focal players’ duration of practicing music ( χ 1 2 = 3.592 , p = 0.058 ). 4.

Progesterone receptor status was also associated with OS ( P =0.0107, Figure 2D ), whereas estrogen receptor status conferred an OS benefit with marginal significance ( P =0.0580, Figure 2B ).

Moreover, when compared to the baseline values and different time points of CASI scores, subjects in the EAHE group showed an increasing trend with marginal significance (71.75 ± 17.12 to 75.35 ± 15.86; p = 0.058) whereas the subjects in the placebo group showed a decreasing trend from the baseline to 49 weeks (73.52 ± 14.51 to 69.67 ± 16.62; p = 0.064).

Higher baseline serum EPO concentration associated with increased risk for thromboembolism with a marginal significance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–2.6, p = 0.058, Table 1 ), adjusting for age, gender, haemoglobin genotype, hydroxyurea therapy, recent blood transfusion and batches of EPO measurement.

The difference between group A and group B approached marginal significance (p=0.058, unadjusted).

There were no statistically significant differences between the pharmacies where syringes were successfully purchased and those where the purchase attempt was unsuccessful; however, female mystery shoppers were more likely to have a successful purchase outcome than male shoppers, with marginal significance (p = 0.058).

The DFS also favored NCT arms in these patients with HR of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.30 to 1.02) with marginal significance (p=0.058).

Although the TLR pathway had a marginal significance ( p = 0.058), it was more significant than the NLR pathway ( p = 0.91), while the RLR pathway showed the highest significance ( p = 0.024) of all the PRRs expressed in response to SAV-3 infection in TO-cells.

Results The mGluR5 density increased with marginal significance (+16%; P = 0.058) in the prefrontal cortex of FXS patients or carriers compared with matched healthy controls.

After this procedure, a marginal significance of the right hippocampus was found ( P = 0.058, SVC corrected).