Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0551.1× alphagold
The pretreatment predictors or factors could be associated with poor/good outcomes even in the successfully recanalized AIS patients, and univariate logistic regression (Table 3 ) showed an association between volume of Tmax > 12s (critically hypoperfused region) and favorable outcome, but only had a marginal significance (OR, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.971-1, p = 0.055).
marginal significancep = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Additionally, while partialing out the effect of child age, there were negative correlations between the total CELF score of the child and the total number of adult utterances ( r [19] = −0.48, p = 0.031), total number of adult questions ( r [19] = −0.61, p = 0.004), number of adult closed questions ( r [19] = −0.57, p = 0.008), and marginal significance for number of adult open questions ( r [19] = −0.44, p = 0.055).
marginal significancep = 0.0551.1× alphagold
A comparison of the pairwise expression levels between miR-155-5p and mRNA BRCA1 within WBCs for each patient and carrier revealed a significant negative correlation ( p = 0.0001 and p = 0.034) ( Figure 7 A,B) for patients with breast and ovarian cancer, respectively, with marginal significance ( p = 0.055) for the carriers ( Figure 7 C), which was not the case for controls.
marginal significancep=0.0551.1× alphagold
PD-L1 exhibited marginal significance among distinct subtypes (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0.055; figure 1A ) and was still a predictor for PFS (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00, p=0.005) when adjusting for PTCL subtypes in the multivariate Cox regression algorithm ( figure 1C and online supplemental figure S1B ), indicating the strong and relatively independent predictive capability of PD-L1.
marginal significancep = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Results The results showed that under all the culture priming conditions, the novelty of the story-writing task reached marginal significance [ F (3, 76) = 2.656, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.410], and the novelty score of the story-writing task in the United States was significantly higher than that in the control group ( p = 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the other groups.