Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Max to min peaks comparison of non-paretic side showed marginal significance before and after HAL intervention for knee joint ( P -value np-pre Vs np-post: 0.03, OP: 33.3%) and significant difference when comparing patients before and after HAL intervention against healthy volunteers ( P -value np-pre Vs healthy: <0.01, OP: 99.8%; np-post Vs healthy: <0.01, OP: 93.4%).
The reason for the significantly inferior survival of those randomised to maintenance therapy is therefore unclear. Given the small numbers of patients accrued to this study, the absence of a clear explanation for the inferior survival of the maintenance group and the marginal significance of the difference, it is probably wisest to interpret the data as showing no benefit for maintenance chemotherapy.
Thus, the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) reports a trend for HLA-C*04:01 association to the disease severity in the Italian population with a marginal significance, and a significantly lower number of HLA class I bound SARS‐CoV‐2 peptides in the most severe group of the Italian and Spanish patients ( 35 ).
Within the groups, there was also generally no difference in the reproductive output of pairs from within‐line versus between‐line crosses; the only exception was in group D where one within‐line cross showed higher reproductive output than the between line hybrid cross, with marginal significance (Table 5 ; Figure 4B ).
( Table 1 ) The APCs showed the following trends: For the overall population, the AAMR decreased non-significantly from 1999 to 2014 (APC = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.61 to 0.18), increased with marginal significance from 2014 to 2018 (APC = 4.26, 95% CI: 0.00 to 8.69), and remained stable from 2018 to 2023 (APC = 0.15, 95% CI: -1.56 to 1.88).
Multiple comparisons for the reward variant using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test showed that only the unidirectional instructions for seeking reward differed from the standard and no hint instructions; however, the significance levels of these variables were p = 0.08 and p = 0.09, respectively, indicating marginal significance.
Rs854571 was associated with hemorrhagic stroke, with marginal significance ( P unadjusted = 0.0500, OR = 0.76 [95% CI = 0.57-1.00]) using the additive model, and rs705381 showed a significant association in both additive ( P adjusted = 0.0290, OR = 0.62 [95% CI = 0.40-0.95]) and dominant models ( P adjusted = 0.0165, OR = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.36-0.90]) (Table 4 ).