Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significanceP = 0.051.0× alphagold
Calcium-phosphate metabolic profile The frequencies of calcium-phosphate metabolism-associated events were similar between the ALN/D5600 treatment group and calcitriol treatment group, except for hypercalciuria at 6 months, with a marginal significance (9.4% vs. 18.5%, P = 0.05) (Table 2 ).
marginal significancep -value < 0.051.0× alphagold
4 b, we inferred a list of 16 candidate master regulator (“MR”) TFs: ATF3, CEBPB, CEBPD, EHF, ELK3, FOSL2, FOXO3, HOXA7, IRF4, IRF8, JARID2, RARG, TCF7L2, THRB, ZEB2 and ZNF217 that either: (a) are significantly differentially expressed between bulk cDC1 and cDC2 (BH p.adj < 0.05, absolute value of log2 fold change > 1, Additional file 2 : Table S5); or (b) regulate the differentially expressed genes and exhibit differential expression between bulk cDC1 and cDC2 with marginal significance ( p -value < 0.05, absolute value of log2 fold change > 1, Additional file 2 : Table S5).
marginal significanceP = 0.051.0× alphagold
The genetic effects of the six loci were further evaluated on the GC risk according to the confirmed histological type (intestinal and diffuse type), and the GA genotype of rs17037102 in DKK2 was found in association with an increased risk of diffuse GC with only marginal significance (adjusted OR = 1.77, 95 % CI: 1.01-3.11, P = 0.05).
marginal significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
Regarding the CES-D, which is the primary outcome measure, the intervention effects estimated by the mixed-effects model analysis at T1 (postintervention) were not significant, although the CES-D score at T1 of the iCBT arm was lower with marginal significance as compared with that at T1 of the waiting list arm (−1.28, 95% CI: −2.58 to 0.02, p = 0.05).
marginal significancep =0.051.0× alphagold
NBRM The NBRM applied to the regions of the European part of the RF (Zone 1 at Figure 1 ) identified the following significant factors associated with the intensity of ASF outbreaks among wild boars: the proportion of forest cover, the number of ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs, and the density of the wild boar population (the latter with a marginal significance level of p =0.05) ( Table 2 ).
marginal significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
In the motivated effort model, only the group effect that had already being observed across all load conditions achieved marginal significance ( b = -3.02, t = -1.97, p = 0.05, n = 54), but no effect of maximum digit span ( b = -0.48, t = -0.90, p = 0.37, n = 54) or motivated effort ( b = 0.04, t = 0.20, p = 0.84, n = 54) was found.
Objective Versus Subjective Effort in Schizophrenia.
Front Psychol · 2020 · PMC7365134