“marginal significance”

Male hamsters exhibited a weaker positive linear association that reached marginal significance (p < 0.05).

The difference in trifecta achievement rates between the two groups showed marginal significance (p = 0.05).

The gender gap in reaction time exhibited marginal significance, indicating that males acted more promptly in engaging in heroic actions ( F (1,91) = 3.958, P = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.042; Fig. 1 E ).

However, NK cells consistently showed marginal significance (defined as nominal p < 0.05) for heritability enrichment in cell-type-specific open chromatin regions across two independent GWAS and in the cell-type-specific expression analysis where NK cells were compared with T cell subsets using a curated list of genome-wide significant loci for AS.

However marginal significance was found with the GAST scores ( p = 0.05).

In this study, tumor size exhibited marginal significance in univariate analysis ( p = 0.05), prompting reflection on the limitations of traditional statistical thresholds ( p < 0.05).

However, between group showed insignificant results p > 0.05 in MPR group, whereas MET shows marginal significance in only in pain intensity p < 0.05 [ 24 ].

Findings with marginal significance (0.1 < p < 0.05), such as sex differences in Area‐vent and aqueductal resistance and sex‐specific correlations between aqueductal resistance and Ratio‐Area, should be interpreted cautiously.

It should be noted, however, that although the difference in flowering time between this s5KO and Columbia or MyoB 3KO controls was very significant (p<0.001), the statistical analysis pointed to only marginal significance of the difference with myosin 2KO (p = 0.05).

Higher cholesterol was associated with a steeper slope of decline in attention and working memory ( P < .001), and marginal significance for verbal memory ( P = .05; Supplementary Table 2 ).

NBRM The NBRM applied to the regions of the European part of the RF (Zone 1 at Figure 1 ) identified the following significant factors associated with the intensity of ASF outbreaks among wild boars: the proportion of forest cover, the number of ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs, and the density of the wild boar population (the latter with a marginal significance level of p =0.05) ( Table 2 ).

The difference in TG showed marginal significance (4.18 in boys and 4.30 in girls, p = 0.05); the other MetS components (BMI, FBG, and HDL-C) did not differ by gender.

PP analyses largely confirmed the full sample findings, with the exception of concurrent mental health treatment reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.05, Supplementary Table 3 ).

Significant prognostic factors for overall survival were KPS (p = 0.001), presence of tumor necrosis on pretreatment MRI (p = 0.001) with RPA-class and WBI reaching marginal significance (each p = 0.05).

However, we did observe that there was a difference in pupil diameter for “Disgust‐Medium” sounds that reached marginal significance ( M MISO = 0.35 mm, M NON‐MISO = 0.23 mm; t‐ ratio(187) = −1.99, p = 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.47) at this same time point.

In the motivated effort model, only the group effect that had already being observed across all load conditions achieved marginal significance ( b = -3.02, t = -1.97, p = 0.05, n = 54), but no effect of maximum digit span ( b = -0.48, t = -0.90, p = 0.37, n = 54) or motivated effort ( b = 0.04, t = 0.20, p = 0.84, n = 54) was found.

The comparison of the mean of phase angle according to the three cAIx75 tertiles showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.050).

TACE, performed within 1-month post-RT, was a favorable OS prognostic factor with marginal significance (1-year OS, 60.6% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.05; Fig. 3 ).

Aerobic exercise (1 study) showed marginal significance (SMD = −0.43, 95% CI [−0.85, 0.00], p = 0.05).

The best corrected visual acuity gradually improved from preoperative 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR to 0.17 ± 0.16 logMAR at 12 months with a marginal significance ( p = 0.050) (Fig. 1a ) and uncorrected visual acuity also improved, from 0.81 ± 0.38 logMAR to 0.49 ± 0.50 logMAR at 12 months, although it was not statistically significant ( p = 0.635) (Fig. 1b ).

Elevated WBC counts showed marginal significance (OR: 1.5; p=0.05), while serum amylase was not a significant predictor.

First, axial elongation varied significantly with the axis orientation of astigmatism in the combined cohort ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.037) and the younger cohort ( P = 0.031, η 2 = 0.024), demonstrating a marginal significance in the older cohort ( P = 0.050, η 2 = 0.043).

In addition, marginal significance was observed for poor overall survival in patients with frontal lesions (Log rank test: p = 0.050) ( Table 6 ).

The first segment in k = 3 and k = 4 both fell to marginal significance ( p ≈ .05), whereas k = 1’s Seg1 slope remained robustly significant ( p < .001). 3.2.5.

Of the four pairwise joint models including six unique genes, all the associations were attenuated but retained marginal significance (P<0.05).