Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In a study aimed at determining the prognostic factors of perceived health 3 months after surgery, the use of walking aids before the fracture was evidenced as a significant and independent risk factor for a low PCS-12 score, PCS-12 score prefracture, and cognitive dysfunction, while the only statistically significant and independent risk factor for a low MCS-12 score was the prefracture MCS-12 score, and while the female gender demonstrated marginal significance [ 46 ].
The marginal significance level may also reflect sample size limitations or the possibility that change fatigue’s effects manifest primarily through interaction with other factors, as demonstrated in our moderation analysis.These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence indicating that organizational support systems may help buffer against the negative effects of change-related exhaustion.
In the ANOVA, the MMN amplitude was slightly significantly modulated by Contrast [ F (2, 52) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.10; this result corresponded to an only marginal significance in the linear mixed-effects model with by-subjects random intercepts where by-stimulus random intercepts and by-subject random slopes for Contrast were tested for inclusion: F (2, 54) = 2.9, p = 0.07].
Given the inherent high temporal variance and spatial heterogeneity typical of macroecological field data, this marginal significance strongly indicates a divergent trajectory, suggesting that while the overall abundance hierarchy of dominant species requires a longer temporal window to completely reorganize, the removal of PVM structures has successfully initiated a targeted shift in community composition at Jiaogang Lake relative to the control site.
Group B showed consistent significant gains at both time points [T1: 27.59 (95% CI: 9.54, 45.64), p = 0.003; T2: 20.91 (95% CI: 2.86, 38.96), p = 0.024], while Group A showed significant improvement at T1 [18.27 (95% CI: 0.22, 36.32), p = 0.047] with marginal significance at T2.