“marginal significance”

Interestingly, we found that tumors with 9p21.3 deletion had lower level of CD8 + tumor infiltration lymphocytes (TILs) than those without 9p21.3 deletion, with marginal significance (Student’s t -test, P = 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 10a ).

The quality of the teacher–child relationship also reached marginal significance in terms of gender ( t (511) = −1.93, p = 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.17), which meant that left-behind girls ( M girs = 3.92, SD = 0.62) had a higher relationship quality with their teachers than boys ( M boys = 3.81, SD = 0.60).

PHA stimulated HD blood lymphocytes showed lower numbers of Tac positive cells than normal blood lymphocytes, with marginal significance (P<0.05), while after MLC stimulation, both groups showed almost identical numbers of Tac antigen bearing cells.

In addition, tumor size was positively correlated with Bcl-2 expression in luminal cells (r = 0.4; P<0.0001) and marginal significance was found for a negative correlation with Bax IRS scale in luminal cells (r = -0.2; P = 0.05).

The association between percent of total energy from sugar and body fat percent at follow-up had marginal significance ( p = 0.05).

In addition, associations of the BOLA3 locus with gestational length, and the TEKT3 and the TGFB1 loci with preterm birth showed marginal significance ( P < 0.05).

In addition, grade 3 or higher adverse effects due to CT were more frequent in the PTR group with marginal significance (OR: 1.74, 95% CI, 0.99–3.06, P = 0.05), and other adverse outcomes were comparable.

Analyses were repeated after weighting for non-representativeness, with little observed difference other than cancer worry reaching marginal significance (p ≤ 0.05).

Notably, we discerned three protein-MS pairs reaching marginal significance levels from the deCODE (P < 0.05 for two-sample MR analysis).

After eliminating associations with a P‐HEIDI value less than 0.01, a total of 4,880 CpG sites around 285 distinct genes met the criteria for marginal significance ( p < 0.05), as shown in Table S3 .

A total of 165 protein-CAD associations were identified at the marginal significance level ( p < 0.05) through the proteome-wide MR analysis.

It should be noted, however, that although the difference in flowering time between this s5KO and Columbia or MyoB 3KO controls was very significant (p<0.001), the statistical analysis pointed to only marginal significance of the difference with myosin 2KO (p = 0.05).

In the motivated effort model, only the group effect that had already being observed across all load conditions achieved marginal significance ( b = -3.02, t = -1.97, p = 0.05, n = 54), but no effect of maximum digit span ( b = -0.48, t = -0.90, p = 0.37, n = 54) or motivated effort ( b = 0.04, t = 0.20, p = 0.84, n = 54) was found.

Another retrospective study including 441 NAFLD cases and 441 propensity score-matched controls demonstrated that NAFLD independently increased the risk of overall CRN occurrence with marginal significance (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.71; p = 0.05) [ 35 ].

Though ACs showed marginal significance (* p < 0.05), the migratory improvement was far weaker than that of hCMEC/D3.

IT exhibited significantly superior BBS improvements compared to both ET and CT ( P < 0.001), while post-hoc comparisons indicated marginal significance between ET and CT ( P = 0.05).

Finally, the within-subjects effect reveals marginal significance ( p = 0.05) between the measurement values​​and cinch type.

The anteroposterior stability index decreased after the insole intervention, with marginal significance and a large ES ( P = .050, ES = 0.51).

NBRM The NBRM applied to the regions of the European part of the RF (Zone 1 at Figure 1 ) identified the following significant factors associated with the intensity of ASF outbreaks among wild boars: the proportion of forest cover, the number of ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs, and the density of the wild boar population (the latter with a marginal significance level of p =0.05) ( Table 2 ).

The mean percentages of spermatozoa having intact plasma membrane determined by HOST were comparable across the diluents ( p > 0.05) except for the marginal significance found between media I and II ( p = 0.05).

There were no significant differences in seroprevalence (p>0.05) for the remaining variables, although marginal significance was achieved for dogs being fed fetuses, and rurality (0.1>p>0.05).

Regarding the CES-D, which is the primary outcome measure, the intervention effects estimated by the mixed-effects model analysis at T1 (postintervention) were not significant, although the CES-D score at T1 of the iCBT arm was lower with marginal significance as compared with that at T1 of the waiting list arm (−1.28, 95% CI: −2.58 to 0.02, p = 0.05).

When comparing outcomes by IMS regimens, there were no significant differences in preterm births ( p = 0.60) between groups; however, marginal significance was observed for live births ( p = 0.05) ( Table S1B and Fig.

In addition, marginal significance was observed for poor overall survival in patients with frontal lesions (Log rank test: p = 0.050) ( Table 6 ).

The presence of any comorbidity showed marginal significance in the cumulative rate of AKI occurrence (log-rank P =0.05).