The median TSH concentrations of pregnant women were lower than that of non-pregnant women with marginal significance in 3+0 to 5+6 weeks of gestation and with statistical significance in 6+0 to 6+6, 7+0 to 7+6, 8+0 to 8+6, 9+0 to 9+6, 10+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation.
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
Although the serotonergic synapse pathway showed marginal significance, the 95% confidence interval crosses over 1, meaning that there is no impact on the survival of the patients.
Further, is the marginal significance driven by the rare allele (AA, n=9)?
While the estimate for the continuous measure of blood pressure suggests an interaction of the BMI PGS and education, there are reasons to question the credibility of this particular result: its marginal significance ( P value of 0.041), the weak direct effect of the PGS ( P value of 0.458), and the low power anticipated in the preanalysis plan (in the most optimistic case, 17% power to detect an effect at 5% significance).
The SVCG achieved marginal significance using the t -test approach but was not significant with the Dunnett’s approach.
We, however, were unable to confirm this in our global analysis, although we detected a marginal significance in set 1.
Although the OS and DFS benefit for TO patients did reach marginal significance in long-term follow-up (log-rank P=0.06/0.08, the TO group demonstrated a significant survival advantage within 60 months post-surgery, with higher OS (68.8% vs. 59.3%; HR 0.59, P=0.01) and DFS (62.9% vs. 55.6%; HR 0.64, P=0.02) compared to the non-TO group.
The enrichment of GO terms related to oxidation-reduction process, transport and transporter activity in the less stringent dataset suggests that many genes, showing consistent if only marginal significance of differential expression, are likely involved in the same physiological processes as the genes from the more stringent set, underlining the relevance of such processes in in viv o responses to zinc excess.
Comparing the gender differences, it was found that there was no significant difference in the total score; however, in the factors of impaired social functioning, replacement of real to virtual social relationships, and excessive buying, male fans scored significantly higher than female fans, while female fans scored higher than male fans in terms of mood alteration, showing marginal significance.
3.1.2 Accuracy A similar pattern emerged for accuracy ( Figure 2b ), where there was also main effect of Quarter, F (1.65,37.86) = 2.71, p = 0.05, though with marginal significance.
Univariate logistic regression revealed that Reflection (OR = 1.3, 95 % CI: 1.1–1.7, P FDR = 0.038; n tests = 3) and Depression (OR = 1.1, 95 % CI: 1.0–1.2, P FDR = 0.038; n tests = 3) were significantly related to relapse, with Brooding showing marginal significance (OR = 1.2, 95 % CI: 1.0–1.4, P uncorrected = 0.071, P FDR = 0.071; n tests = 3).
RE (β = -2.957, p = 0.073) and VO 2 max (β = 8.536, p = 0.071) showed marginal significance, indicating potential performance benefits, though these should be interpreted cautiously.
In contrast, the high-control group showed only marginal significance (AOR = 3.99, 95% CI = 0.87–18.27).
The latter grouping results in a reduced effect with a marginal significance in 6 years, partially a result from misclassification, although the effect remains significant in 10 and 14 years.
There were no significant differences in CD8 + TIL densities and PD-L1 expression scores between the CIMP subgroups, except for the PD-L1 CPS score, which showed marginal significance (Supplementary Fig.
Implementation We restricted our study to the top 1000 CV SNPs and top 1000 RV SNPs as identified by the marginal significance of a Kruskal-Wallis test of the minor allele counts and SBP values for the 759 samples.
At the single-cell level of TWAS using the panels from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (CLUE) consortium, there was no significant association that passed the multiple testing correction threshold (FDR < 0.05); however, MTMR9 and killer-cell lectin-like receptor C4 ( KLRC4 ) showed marginal significance (0.05 < FDR < 0.1) in CD8+ T-cell and natural killer cell (NK cell), respectively ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
I have no fetish for a p-value threshold of 0.05, but I think it’s risky to conclude “marginal significance” with a p value of 0.097 (which is really 0.1, 10%, not so far from the belly of the normal distribution).
At baseline there is marginal significance in CMT, FSRFT, and SFCT in terms of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), central macular thickness (CMT) and FSRFT between groups (Table 1 ).
Additionally, the emotional illness representations did retain marginal significance, needing to be revisited in further studies.
The child domains showed marginal significance in adaptability and demandingness .
A significance level of 0.05 was used as the criterion to determine statistical significance and 0.10 to determine marginal significance.
The verbal composite distinguished P-MS from HD with statistical significance but failed to separate RR-MS from either HD or P-MS and showed no power to differentiate HD from NIND controls, and marginal significance to do so in OIND controls.
On the other hand, when evaluating the change in eGFR between the periods before and after the study, there was a marginal significance observed.
Results The meta-analysis reveals a marginal significance in new bone formation with PRF, suggesting a trend towards beneficial outcomes that were not statistically significant.