Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

While the estimate for the continuous measure of blood pressure suggests an interaction of the BMI PGS and education, there are reasons to question the credibility of this particular result: its marginal significance ( P value of 0.041), the weak direct effect of the PGS ( P value of 0.458), and the low power anticipated in the preanalysis plan (in the most optimistic case, 17% power to detect an effect at 5% significance).
Although the OS and DFS benefit for TO patients did reach marginal significance in long-term follow-up (log-rank P=0.06/0.08, the TO group demonstrated a significant survival advantage within 60 months post-surgery, with higher OS (68.8% vs. 59.3%; HR 0.59, P=0.01) and DFS (62.9% vs. 55.6%; HR 0.64, P=0.02) compared to the non-TO group.
The enrichment of GO terms related to oxidation-reduction process, transport and transporter activity in the less stringent dataset suggests that many genes, showing consistent if only marginal significance of differential expression, are likely involved in the same physiological processes as the genes from the more stringent set, underlining the relevance of such processes in in viv o responses to zinc excess.
Comparing the gender differences, it was found that there was no significant difference in the total score; however, in the factors of impaired social functioning, replacement of real to virtual social relationships, and excessive buying, male fans scored significantly higher than female fans, while female fans scored higher than male fans in terms of mood alteration, showing marginal significance.
Univariate logistic regression revealed that Reflection (OR = 1.3, 95 % CI: 1.1–1.7, P FDR = 0.038; n tests = 3) and Depression (OR = 1.1, 95 % CI: 1.0–1.2, P FDR = 0.038; n tests = 3) were significantly related to relapse, with Brooding showing marginal significance (OR = 1.2, 95 % CI: 1.0–1.4, P uncorrected = 0.071, P FDR = 0.071; n tests = 3).
At the single-cell level of TWAS using the panels from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (CLUE) consortium, there was no significant association that passed the multiple testing correction threshold (FDR < 0.05); however, MTMR9 and killer-cell lectin-like receptor C4 ( KLRC4 ) showed marginal significance (0.05 < FDR < 0.1) in CD8+ T-cell and natural killer cell (NK cell), respectively ( Supplementary Table S2 ).