“marginal significance”

An association with marginal significance between goitre grades and salt iodization across schools was observed: goitre grade 2 was observed less frequently in children with an adequately iodised salt sample from their household (15.5%; 95% CI = 10.7%-21.3%) when compared to children with a non-iodised salt sample from their household (20.6%, 95% CI = 15.2%-27.0%; Pearson’s χ 2 (4) = 9.585, P = 0.048).

Similarly, for mAF1, the Kruskal-Wallis test also indicated marginal significance with a p-value of 0.0868.

Moreover, the TNM stage showed marginal significance, suggesting that it might be a potential risk factor for acute radiation-induced skin toxicity.

An interpretation of these results suggests that the IA plays no part or only has a marginal significance in cognition among the healthy population.

First, the sample size was relatively small which might explain the marginal significance level of the effect of unpaid assistance and emotional support on MD.

When comparing XRF[Pb] to AAS[Pb], mixed modeling (for which there were no influential observations) showed that both dose and technique were significant factors and that technique x dose was of borderline significance (p = 0.08). Again, the marginal significance of tech- nique x dose indicates that the relationships between lead concentration and dose dif- fered for the two techniques: The lines had slopes and intercepts that were significantly different.

Of the 59,070 variant-lipid associations, 8238 reached the marginal significance threshold of P < 0.05/85/68 = 8.650519e-6 corrected for the 85 GWS loci and the 68 PCs that together explained 90% of the phenotypic variance.

The marginal significance of several findings after multiple testing corrections suggests the need for larger studies to confirm these associations.

In multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses (Table S9 , Supporting Information), the associations of all six atherosclerosis‐associated HDL measurements with CAD risk persisted after adjustment for smoking and alcohol drinking, the two most heritable ASCVD risk factors [ 32 , 33 ] (ORs ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 [ p = 1.34E‐06 to 0.007; FDR = 8.05E‐06 to 0.007]), and adjustment for LDL‐c, the currently recommended primary target for lipid management [ 3 ] (ORs = 0.82 to 0.90 [ p = 6.21E‐05 to 0.027; FDR = 3.73E‐04 to 0.032]) except total lipids in medium HDL with marginal significance ( FDR = 0.055).

Residual tumors in the supradiaphragmatic area ≥5 mm adversely affected progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with marginal significance after PDS despite the lack of effect on survival after IDS/NAC (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs], 6.478 and 6.370; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 2.224-18.864 and 0.953-42.598).

First, there is marginal significance among female PD patients, which encourages us; further research on the association of gender of PD and COMT Val158/108Met polymorphism should be carried out.

Data analysis Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27, with two-tailed significance levels set at α = 0.05 and marginal significance set at α = 0.10.

However, positive lymph nodes (stage III) were associated with inferior DFS with marginal significance on log-rank analysis but were not on multivariate analysis.

However, we report all GFINs in the manuscript in order of their nominal/marginal significance.

For instance, the MR-Egger regression for miR-181b-5p (β=−0.287, P=0.051) and miR-125a-5p (β=−0.245, P=0.084) approached marginal significance but did not cross the threshold, further supporting the lack of a robust reverse causal link.

A Prognostic Score-Based Risk Stratification for Local Relapse In univariable analyses, Karnofsky performance status, PSI status, categorical GTV-P, and V66.88 strongly correlate with LRFS, while age showed only a marginal significance.

We use “significant” to indicate significance at the ≤0.01 level, “marginal significance” to indicate significance between 0.05 and 0.01, and “not significant” to indicate P > 0.05 ( Fig. 2 A ).

However, we did find marginal significance in both these split conditions, and the absence of a three-way interaction effect between self/other, previous, and current congruency suggests that our significant Gratton effect was not specifically driven by only the following self, or only the following other trials.

Additionally, a nominal positive association was observed between riboflavin intake and muscle mass percentage (β = 0.665; 95% CI 0.026 to 1.305; p = 0.042), although this relationship reached only marginal significance after stringent multiple-testing adjustment.

The relationship between the PC5 and hyperglycemia was marginal significance (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38–1.02).

Overall mortality was significantly higher in the FIB-4 index >2.67 group (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.00–2.73), but with only marginal significance in the FIB-4 index 1.3–2.67 group (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.96–2.64).

To account for multiple testing, we used a Bonferroni correction threshold of P < 0.0025 (α = 0.05/20, the number of inspections) as statistically significant evidence for a causal association, and considered P -values between 0.0025 and 0.05 as marginal significance associations in our analyses.

However, the within‐person effects of NSSI on peer problems were strongly attenuated, so that they only reached significance for peer victimization (from Grade 8 to 9, and marginal significance from Grade 10 to 11), and approached significance for friendship stress (see Figures S6–S8 ).

Statistical interpretations, particularly of interaction terms, lack clarity, and some confidence intervals suggest marginal significance.

As shown in Table 1 , HER2 overexpression was correlated with expression of phosphorylated Akt with marginal significance whereas EGFR overexpression was not correlated.