Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

While the trend analysis for categorical AIP showed marginal significance ( P for trend = 0.071 for stage 3 AKI, P for trend = 0.077 for RRT), likely because the strict weighting process reduced the effective sample size, the direction of association remained consistent.
kyathit backgrounds: melanophore nearest-neighbor distance mapped to a broad region of Chr15 (peak LOD = 6.8; q <0.05; Fig 6B and 6E ); log 2 (DV:AP variation) mapped to a broad region of Chr18 (peak LOD = 4.7 with marginal significance at q <0.05; Fig 6C and 6E ); and PC3—associated with melanized pattern element coverage and melanin content—mapped to Chr23 (peak LOD = 5.0; q <0.05; Fig 6D and 6E ).
Integration of previous results Preliminary univariate analyses (using t-values, p -values, and R 2 ) indicated differences in the expected direction—for example, higher scores in social anxiety/shyness and social retraction for the NAP group—but these effects showed marginal significance and limited explained variance ( R 2 between 0.022 and 0.044).
In this respect, from the analysis of the plot reported in Figure 3 B, it is evident that the most significant factor (i.e., that one is more pronounced affecting the mean size of HMBs) is the factor “ freq ” followed by “ flow ”, whereas the factor “ height ” had only a very marginal significance over the investigated response “ size ” (that represents the mean dimension of the produced HMBs).
Furthermore, when we explored the feasibility of applying TSR to various patient subgroups, based on all discovery and validation cohort patients, the predictor remained a statistically significant prognostic factor when stratified by age, sex, and tumour site, and demonstrates marginal significance for the prediction when stratified by stage (Supplementary Fig. 6).
While prior literature suggests prostate volume and operative time are important predictors of stricture formation, our ROC analysis showed that their individual clinical discriminatory power was modest (with AUC values close to 0.50), though operation time maintained a marginal significance in the blind group [ 2 – 6 , 8 ].