Sensitivity analysis concerning sum serum concentration indicated that the association between sum serum concentration and seizure duration was not robust; the result just missed significance ( p = 0.06) when including only ECT number 1–3.
There was a main effect of neuron type (P<.03) but no effect of stimulus (P>0.1) and the interaction just missed significance (P=.06), suggesting that the propensity to burst is more strongly influenced by neuron type than stimulus quality, although both factors may contribute.
CitH3 was only significantly higher at baseline, day 2 and day 5 (p < 0.04) and just missed significance on day 1 (p = 0.06).
The % REM in the light cycle was not impacted by acute or repeated fear stress (Figures 6 B,D); however, the effect of acute stress on % REM in the second light cycle following acute stress just missed significance ( p = 0.06).
However, in the ASD group, only one Same-Function relationship was significantly positive (Alphabet Attention versus Spatial Attention; t (15) = 2.5, P = 0.012, one-tailed), and in addition there was a positive Cross-Function relationship that just missed significance (Alphabet Attention versus Spatial Mentalizing; t (15) = 2.0, P = 0.06, two-tailed; Fig. 3 A).
The scores on the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) differed between the groups at baseline, however the difference just missed significance F (1, 60) = 3.81, p = .06.
The path to APP from CD symptoms was significant (β = 0.31, p < 0.01) but the path to APP from substance use just missed significance (β = 0.15, p = 0.06).
Response times among sequenced blocks were significantly faster than random blocks under both neutral ( t 16 = −3.76, p = .003, d = −0.91; one-tailed) and congruent primes ( t 16 = −5.63, p < .001, d = −1.37), but just missed significance under incongruent primes ( t 16 = −2.24, p = .06, d = −0.54; Fig. 2 A, D ).
The decrease in DP from 77.91 ± 3.04 to 75.58 ± 2.99 mm HG just missed significance t (11) = 2.09, P = 0.06.
The increase for the first four trials only was similar in magnitude (85.9 ± 44%), but just missed significance, t (15) = 2.02, P = 0.06.
Results indicated that IQ just missed significance as a predictor of WM ability, F (1, 36) = 4.00, p = 0.06.
Those findings on image contrast, however, were driven by nodal MZL ( P < 0.01), and just missed significance for extranodal MZL ( P = 0.06).
Of all the genes tested, SUC1 differed the least (3-fold), and the t -test on the RT-PCR data just missed significance (p = 0.06).
On the WMI subtest, the ECH group scored significantly lower than the HCs ( P < .05), and the difference between HC and CCH groups just missed significance ( P = .06).
For the BMI, the difference between the correlation with the ideal-IRAP and the actual-IRAP just missed significance, t (46) = 1.91, p = 0.06.
TTH was more prevalent among males (48.2%) than females (41.1%), but this just missed significance in the adjusted (multivariate) analysis model (aOR = 0.9; p = 0.06).
18 The timed 25-foot walk just missed significance in the alpha lipoic acid group (−0.535 versus 0.137, 95% CI −1.37 to 0.03, p = 0.06).
The interaction effect of NPY and DAMGO was also significant [ F (2,14) = 3.88, p = 0.046, η 2 = 0.357], although the three-way interaction of NPY, DAMGO, and time just missed significance [ F (46,322) = 1.38, p = 0.062, η 2 = 0.164].
There was a significant effect of tone type ( p = 0.026), while the effect of modification type just missed significance ( p = 0.063).
The Time × Group interaction just missed significance, F (2, 96) = 2.84, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.06.
coupled AB_IMA, but just missed significance ( p = 0.065, d z = 2.146) ( Table S3 ).
However, TSP-1 protein levels were significantly reduced ( P < 0.05), and SPARC levels were also reduced, although this just missed significance ( P = 0.065) ( Fig. 4 B).
In the analysis of WKY rats, DES group exhibited a trend of less avoidance responses compared to CTL group as reflected by main effect of treatment that just missed significance ( p = 0.066).
However, in backcross family BC23, which was in the same direction as our previous backcross 6Y-R, the LOD score for C04 just missed significance at the 5% level ( p = 0.0664) to explain the variation in Z11–16:Ald (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).
Interestingly, the positive correlation between “age” and “time on feet” just missed significance ( p = 0.067), which means that in tendency older people were even slightly longer on feet than younger people.