“just missed significance”

This difference was seen in both types of vaccine (BNT162b2 and CoronaVac) and drug-resistant epilepsy, but just missed significance for the second dose (1.13 vs. 1.87, t = 1.921; p = 0.055).

In contrast, the interaction just missed significance at 48 h ( P = 0.055), likely owing to less phospho-α-syn labelling overall being evident.

Subjective effort Although subjective effort increased in both groups relative to the control condition (subliminal: control baseline, 5.94 ± 0.42; subliminal condition, 6.27 ± 0.41; supraliminal: control baseline, 5.83 ± 0.38; supraliminal condition, 6.33 ± 0.43), the two-way ANOVA revealed that the effect of Condition just missed significance ( F (1,34) = 3.899; MSE = 0.801; p = 0.056; effect size: partial η 2 = 0.103).

However, there were no significant differences between groups [χ 2 (1) < 1, p = 0.879], and the interaction just missed significance [χ 2 (1) = 3.6, p = 0.056].

Dropping the weakest predictor, age, b < 0.01, SE = 0.01, t (162) = 0.09, p = .931, led to a model that just missed significance, R 2 = .045, F (3, 163) = 2.57, p = .056.

The main effect of WMC just missed significance, F (1, 77) = 3.756, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.02.

Control diet-treated animals displayed a 34% increase in total brain Aβ 40 relative to baseline mice, though this increase just missed significance ( Fig. 3A , p = 0.056, t -test).

The interaction of the effect of piercing with hemisphere and group just missed significance, F(1,30) = 3.9, p = .057, η p 2 = .12, 1-β = .98.

The results of the latter two RCTs were also combined in an individual patient data meta-analysis; the result just missed significance (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.34–1.02, p = 0.057) [ 135 ].

When pooling across both sexes, there were no differences between NGF and saline before injection (PD85 and 90: D = 0.197 and 0.047), but lower PPT at the injection site 1 day after NGF (PD86, PD91) with medium to large effect sizes ( D = 0.616, 0.634) that just missed significance vs. the saline controls ( p = 0.057 and 0.051) (Table 4 , top).

The group difference for recognizing joy just missed significance ( P = 0.058, Kruskal–Wallis test).

While the DSR-all was not significantly different for the two patient groups at T1, this difference just missed significance at T2 (t(41) = -1.95, P = 0.058).

The correlation between the ten-strategy benefit and the addends-compare benefit just missed significance r (23) = .4, p = .058.

large) as factors showed an interaction that just missed significance, F (1,11) = 4.48, p = 0.058.

HR outcome group differences Comparing AOSI scores for the HR-ASD and HR-No ASD outcome groups and the LR group, at 7 m the one-way ANOVA just missed significance F (2, 98) = 2.94, p = .058 (see Table 2 and Fig. 1 ).

Additionally, we measured the percentage of time in the corners, and we found that was not affected by stress treatment (p = 0.18), or sex (p = 0.18), and the interaction between stress treatment x sex just missed significance [F (3,96) = 2.58; p = 0.058; Fig. 2 E].

To evaluate whether the reliability was significantly greater for STRIPES than for SMRT, we compared the two correlations using Fisher’s r to z transform; this just missed significance ( z = 1.89, p = 0.059, two-tailed).

This lateral asymmetry of the N1 was absent when the salient distractor was presented laterally and the target appeared at a vertical position ( t (25) = -0.1, p = 0.9, BF 01 = 4.8), while it just missed significance for the TL ( t (25) = -1.98, p = 0.059) and the DL ( t (25) = -2, p = 0.056) conditions.

The scores on the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) differed between the groups at baseline, however the difference just missed significance F (1, 60) = 3.81, p = .06.

18 The timed 25-foot walk just missed significance in the alpha lipoic acid group (−0.535 versus 0.137, 95% CI −1.37 to 0.03, p = 0.06).

participants without hypertension), the average systolic blood pressure reduction just missed significance, 3.27 mmHg (−0.09, 7.15, I 2 = 0%, P = 0.06, n = 259 from six studies), Figure 4 .

The effect of CPF on body weight just missed significance on day 21 [F (1,23) = 27.204, p = 0.06], while at adulthood (70 days) this trend was no longer evident [F (1,18) = 12.853, p = 0.16].

The increase for the first four trials only was similar in magnitude (85.9 ± 44%), but just missed significance, t (15) = 2.02, P = 0.06.

Differences in caregiver impairment across orphan status just missed significance (p = 0.06), but suggest that caregiver impairment may be more common among caregivers of orphans rather than non-orphans in this sample.

CitH3 was only significantly higher at baseline, day 2 and day 5 (p < 0.04) and just missed significance on day 1 (p = 0.06).