Barely Significant
← all phrases

“indeterminate significance”

138 sentences · 138 papers · 164 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

33 (9.19%) samples were classified as non-diagnostic (Bethesda I), 149 (41.50%) as benign (Bethesda II), 47 (13.10%) as atypia of indeterminate significance/follicular lesion of indeterminate significance (AUS/FLUS, Bethesda III), 7 (1.95%) as follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN, Bethesda IV), 17 (4.74%) as suspicious for malignancy (SUSP, Bethesda V), and 123 (29.53%) as malignant (Bethesda VI).
Regarding the latter, the increasing use of older donors and the more likely presence of gene mutations associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate significance (CHIP) in older populations is an emerging concern ( Nawas et al. 2021 ).
Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the diagnosis of HFpEF can be challenging given that in some cases natriuretic peptide levels may be normal and echocardiographic indices may be of indeterminate significance. 1 , 2 In such cases, stress hemodynamic investigation has proven to be the gold‐standard diagnostic approach. 3 , 4 Key characteristics of hemodynamic responses to exercise in patients with HFpEF compared with normal subjects include marked elevations of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), central venous pressure (CVP), and reduced cardiac output (CO) reserve.
After a while it becomes necessary for him to take refuge in the no man’s land of “dysplasia” and other “entities of unknown or indeterminate significance” and, compiling data for “predicting outcome,” he becomes something like a haruspex, this diviner of antiquity whose function was to predict, for the benefit of the Emperor (the clinician), the issue of a battle by reading in the viscerae of a sacrificed animal (the patient) ( Figure 1 ).
Predicting outcome: a fourfold delusion!
Dermatol Pract Concept · 2012 · PMC3663346
(0 and 1 were collapsed since 1 represents signal hyperintensity on T2-weighted images of indeterminate significance.) Subchondral sclerosis was scored at baseline from 0 to 3 for each region of the knee as: 0: none, 1: <25% of the subregion, 2: 25–50% of the subregion, 3: >50% of the subregion.
The results of cytology testing reported that 48 (8.5%) women had cervical abnormalities, which included 16 (2.8%) classified as ASCUS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Unknown Significance), 6 (1.1%) classified as ASCH (Atypical Squamous Cells of Indeterminate Significance), 16 (2.8%) classified as LGSIL (Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion), 4 (0.7%) classified as HGSIL (High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion), and 6 (1.1%) classified CIN II + CIN III (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia) (Table 1 ).