Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 1E −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, while the difference between term and moderate to late preterm TREC was significant but not meaningful, 108 (70–170) vs 101 (64–164) median TREC ( p = 0.0017), the differences between term and extremely preterm, 49 (29–92), or very preterm, 88 (52–149), were both highly significant ( p = 1E −16 , p = 4E −6 , respectively) and meaningful.
highly significantp values < 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ChIP-seq showed there was a highly significant correlation ( p values < 10 −16 ) between ER binding fold changes induced by the addition of elacestrant or fulvestrant in the three cell lines tested (Pearson correlations with p values <10 −16 ; 0.78 MCF7, 0.47 MCF7-LTED wt and 0.60 MCF7-LTED Y537C ) especially in regions where there was increased ER binding after treatment versus E2 (Fig. 4A ).
highly significantp -value <10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed we observed for all species a highly significant correlation between GC content and thermodynamic stability and folding strength (Spearman’s rho =0.239, p -value <10 -16 for all lincRNAs considering folding strength) as observed in [ 49 ].
Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species.
BMC Evol Biol · 2017 · PMC5494802
highly significantP < 1 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Next-generation sequencing in pooled samples from patients with Crohn's disease and controls identified additional independent risk variants in two of the known risk genes ( NOD2 and IL23R ), a highly significant association with a protective splice variant in CARD9 ( P < 1 × 10 −16 , odds ratio ∼0.29), and additional associations with coding variants in several genes ( IL18RAP , CUL2 , C1orf106 , PTPN22 and MUC19 ) ( Rivas et al. , 2011 ).
The future for genetic studies in reproduction.
Mol Hum Reprod · 2014 · PMC3867979
highly significantP -values <10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation between the distance of GO groups in the 0.001 cutoff co-evolution network (that is, their evolutionary distance) and their distance in the corresponding GO ontology network (that is, their functional distance) is highly significant: 0.38 for cellular component, 0.16 for biological process and 0.43 for molecular function (all three with P -values <10 -16 ; a similar trend is observed using the 0.01 cutoff network).