Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = .00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way ANOVA showed a highly significant cohort effect ( F = 14.20, p = .0005, η 2 = 0.69), and a pairwise post-hoc Tukey-HSD test computed with the onset indices for the ND-CI and AD-CI cohorts were not significantly different ( p = .98), but did reveal a significant difference between ND-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0007) and AD-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0018).
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Both the frontal and occipital petalia (see Table 2 ) were highly significant in humans [ t (90) = − 4.94, p < 0.0005 and t (90) = − 7.69, p < 0.0005, respectively], whereas no significant asymmetry was found in either petalia in chimpanzees.
highly significantP = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Serum MDA levels were found to be higher (6.846 ± 1.5) than controls (4.588 ± 1.17) while SOD levels were found to be lower in women with miscarriage (2.26 ± 0.66) than that of control group (3.16 ± 1.13) and difference were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.0005, <0.0001), respectively.
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a multivariable analysis of EFS including pre-transplant IDDA v2.1 ≤ 14 / ≥15 and HCT-CI ≤ 2 / ≥3 and the interaction between these prognostic factors, as well as age at transplant and date of transplant, neither IDDA v2.1 ( p = 0.059, HR = 4.6) nor HCT-CI ( p = 0.057, HR = 7.1) were independently significant, but the interaction between these two factors combined (HCT-CI ≥ 3 and IDDA v2.1 ≥ 15) was highly significant ( p = 0.0005, HR = 18.0), Fig. 3 H.
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When including age as continuous variable, the terms for age x month interactions were highly significant ( p = 0.0005, df = 4), suggesting an important trend to lower rates of suicide attempts following the start of AD treatment at higher ages, but not, or less so, at younger ages.
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The follow-up analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0005; Table S11 ) between combined bioaugmented treatments (LB400 and LB400 + Sap) and combined non-bioaugmented controls (Control and Control + Sap) at 3–4 timepoints in the vapor phase and at T = 3 days in the aqueous phase ( Figure 4 B, 4 D).
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
failed to reach statistical significancep = 0.1062.1× alphaplainly factualgold
When ANOVA of V T with group (patients with CNI therapy versus controls) and VOI as fixed factors was performed separately for HAB and MAB subjects, the group effect (lower V T in patients with CNI therapy) was highly significant in the HAB subjects ( p < 0.0005), but it failed to reach statistical significance in the MAB subjects ( p = 0.106).
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Considering the influence of drinking water source, reduction in Campylobacter occurrence for using tube-well water in comparison to river water was observed to be highly significant (p < 0.0005) in cloacal swab samples and significant (p < 0.005) in egg surface swab and drinking water samples but insignificant for soil samples (Fig. 4 B).