A one-way ANOVA showed a highly significant cohort effect ( F = 14.20, p = .0005, η 2 = 0.69), and a pairwise post-hoc Tukey-HSD test computed with the onset indices for the ND-CI and AD-CI cohorts were not significantly different ( p = .98), but did reveal a significant difference between ND-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0007) and AD-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0018).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
control cells (Vo), differences that are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0005; Figure 1C ).
2 a, the 12 samples collected from eight patients in the acute phase showed a highly significant increase in the compleasome complex compared with the samples collected more than 10 days after onset of symptoms (42 samples from 22 patients) ( p < 0.0005).
Both the frontal and occipital petalia (see Table 2 ) were highly significant in humans [ t (90) = − 4.94, p < 0.0005 and t (90) = − 7.69, p < 0.0005, respectively], whereas no significant asymmetry was found in either petalia in chimpanzees.
The analysis of variance of the mean SGN densities in deafened ears showed highly significant differences both for the total cochlear ( p = 0.0005) and for the basal region ( p < 0.0001) when compared with NH.
In the distal ileum however, there was a modest but highly significant reduction of the number of ChAT-ir neurones (Fig. 4c–f ) that were colocalised with HuC/HuD in MPTP tissues (Fig. 4h ; P = 0.0005; two-tailed Student’s unpaired t -test n = 5–7).
Serum MDA levels were found to be higher (6.846 ± 1.5) than controls (4.588 ± 1.17) while SOD levels were found to be lower in women with miscarriage (2.26 ± 0.66) than that of control group (3.16 ± 1.13) and difference were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.0005, <0.0001), respectively.
In comparison with experts, the difference is highly significant at day 1 (p = 0.0005) but this difference is no longer significant at day 15 ( p = .25).
The analysis of population structure by means of Wright’s [ 23 ] F ST statistic (0.42) was highly significant ( P = 5x10 -4 ).
On the contrary, the combination of all three miRNAs ( figure 4D ) revealed a fair but highly significant AUC value (0.72, p=0.0005), with a specificity of 0.83 and a sensitivity of 0.57.
The difference was highly significant (Fisher’s Exact Test, p = 0.0005).
In a multivariable analysis of EFS including pre-transplant IDDA v2.1 ≤ 14 / ≥15 and HCT-CI ≤ 2 / ≥3 and the interaction between these prognostic factors, as well as age at transplant and date of transplant, neither IDDA v2.1 ( p = 0.059, HR = 4.6) nor HCT-CI ( p = 0.057, HR = 7.1) were independently significant, but the interaction between these two factors combined (HCT-CI ≥ 3 and IDDA v2.1 ≥ 15) was highly significant ( p = 0.0005, HR = 18.0), Fig. 3 H.
From 1990 to 2000, however, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.0005; table S2) switch to 67% of glaciers advancing (median rate, 20.0 m year −1 ).
Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test shows a highly significant difference between the groups for all of the continuous outcome variables ( p <0.0005).
When including age as continuous variable, the terms for age x month interactions were highly significant ( p = 0.0005, df = 4), suggesting an important trend to lower rates of suicide attempts following the start of AD treatment at higher ages, but not, or less so, at younger ages.
Correspondingly, a highly significant difference for MFI comparing rosetting cultures of blood group A and partly rosetting of blood group O was seen for PAvarO (p = 0,0005) that disappeared with the growth with the pgIgG that prevents rosettes to form in culture (p = 0,0686).
The follow-up analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0005; Table S11 ) between combined bioaugmented treatments (LB400 and LB400 + Sap) and combined non-bioaugmented controls (Control and Control + Sap) at 3–4 timepoints in the vapor phase and at T = 3 days in the aqueous phase ( Figure 4 B, 4 D).
When ANOVA of V T with group (patients with CNI therapy versus controls) and VOI as fixed factors was performed separately for HAB and MAB subjects, the group effect (lower V T in patients with CNI therapy) was highly significant in the HAB subjects ( p < 0.0005), but it failed to reach statistical significance in the MAB subjects ( p = 0.106).
Using either CATH or SCOP-based structural class annotations, enhancement of structure prediction performance is highly significant in terms of both GDT_TS (at least +2.6, p-values < 0.0005) and RMSD (−0.4, p-values < 0.005).
Considering the influence of drinking water source, reduction in Campylobacter occurrence for using tube-well water in comparison to river water was observed to be highly significant (p < 0.0005) in cloacal swab samples and significant (p < 0.005) in egg surface swab and drinking water samples but insignificant for soil samples (Fig. 4 B).
Similarly, post-BCG vaccination, there was a highly significant increase in BCG-specific CD4 + and CD8 + Ki67 + IFN-γ + , TNF-α + , IL-2 + and IL-17 + T cells, P < 0 .0005 ( P = 0 .003 for CD8 + IL-17 + T cells).
Difference between the mean values of the WFs for the four shortest and four longest ICIs proved to be highly significant [ t (9) = 7.21, p < 0.0005].
Furthermore, changes in responses on the Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, the Diabetes Attitude Scale, and the Diabetes Empowerment Scale were highly significant at the 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month posttests at the p < 0.0005 level [ 46 ].
The effect of time was highly significant ( p < 0.0005) for all fatty acids, except for C22:6ω3, where the effect was significant at a level of p = 0.036.
Highly significant was the statistical difference in PWVg between HDC women and each other group: P < 0.0005 versus CG; P < 0.01 versus H; P < 0.03 versus HC, and P < 0.05 versus HD.