“highly significant”

A P -value < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.005 (**) was considered highly significant, and P < 0.0005 (***) was considered extremely significant.

It was observed that, for general empathy, the factors Year and Gender were highly significant (p = .0005 and p = .021 respectively), the value of eta-squared (0.056) was satisfactory, and the power observed (0.998) is good.

Differences in the LARS score among QoL categories were highly significant ( p < 0.0005) ( Figure 2 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between teeth clenching and temporomandibular joint pain, p -value = 0.0005, V = 0.3695.

PERMANOVA comparisons between each plant-based analogue subcategory and its animal-based reference counterpart revealed highly significant differences across all categories ( p ≤ 0.0005). 3.3.

While for CD4+ cells the difference was statistically significant only on day 15 ( P <0.005) and 20 ( P <0.05), the difference was consistently observed for CD5 and CD8 positive cells and was highly significant for CD8 + cells ( P <0.0005).

However, when these SNPs were combined into a risk score, a highly significant association ( p = 0.0005) was found.

Comparing the multiple and single cranial bone fractures among the fatal and nonfatal cases and applying the chi square test, multiple bone fracture was found to be highly significant for fatality p = 0.0005.

Strikingly, 80% of patients with RCD type II (4/5) progressing to an EATL had frequencies of the most common clonotype >50%, resulting in a highly significant difference if compared with any other CD group (ACD p=0.0005; CD GFD p=0.0005; RCD type I p=0.0016; Marsh I p=0.0357) as well as to controls (p=0.0010; figure 3 A).

This difference, however, was highly significant in Malayalam readers ( p < .0005) but not in Telugu readers ( p = .09).

crudilactis species presented highly significant variations (p < 0.0005).

The highly significant difference ( P < 0.0005) between uptakes in HER2-positive and HER2-negative xenografts at 2 h postinjection confirmed the in vivo targeting specificity.

We thus fitted the additive model, and, in this model, the method of density estimation was not significant (p = 0.1266) while the effect of the log.BodyMass was highly significant (p = 0.0005, conditional R 2 = 0.90).

However, there are significant differences ( p < 0.05) in the CGRP plasma levels between the control groups, CGRP concentrations in ileum between the high-histamine groups and highly significant differences ( p < 0.0005) in neural tissues between Altromin and Ssniff fed mice.

The slopes (dependence on day of infection) and intercepts were highly significant, for both primary and secondary infection groups (p<0.0005 in all cases).

In both cases, time at 8°C, brood number and the interaction between these variables were highly significant ( P <0.0005), but reproductive output did not differ significantly between flies kept with or without food (2–14 d; P = 0.6) or housed in different kinds of vials with food (0–20 d; P = 0.3), and there were no significant interactions between housing conditions and the other variables.

A highly significant negative correlation between changes in mydriasis and pupil size at rest could be observed both on the hypertonic (r = − 0.921, p < 0.0005, Y = − 1.269X − 0.010) and on the hypotonic side (r = − 0.800, p < 0.0005, Y = − 1.399X + 0.09).

The relative increase at the intervention park play-scape compared with the control park playground were highly significant from both T1 to T2 (IRR = 14.45, 95% CI = 4.15–50.28, p < 0.0005) and T1 to T3 (IRR = 24.19, 95% CI = 6.79–86.19, p < 0.0005).

Mean v1.0 scores for these successful vs unsuccessful quitters displayed highly significant differences (p = 0.0005, one tailed t test) ( Fig 1 ).The quit success scores were significantly higher in the successful quitters than in the matched comparison group of nonquitters in ways that were not readily explained by several other comparisons ( Supplementary analysis E ).

The multiple linear regression model that included all EMG responses (corrugator and zygomaticus) per condition was highly significant F (12, 22) = 5.092, p = 0.0005.

CIN showed a higher abundance on protein level in every cell line cultured under serum-free conditions and the difference in protein levels between the culture conditions was highly significant (Fig. 1f , p < 0.0005).

The effect of time was highly significant ( p < 0.0005) for all fatty acids, except for C22:6ω3, where the effect was significant at a level of p = 0.036.

These differences were highly significant (P = 0.0005 and P =<0.0001) suggesting increased migratory potential of cells surviving repeated DNA damage.

These differences were highly significant (p<0.0005) ( Figure 2a ).

In four of these cases, the increase is highly significant ( p <0.0005, one-sided sign rank test).