“highly significant”

The HI subjects presented with a highly significant deficit in verbal fluency where NH individuals named on average 1.7 (±2.8) animals more than their HI counterparts (HI =6.2 [±2.6]; NH =7.9 [±2.8], P <0.00034).

The women proportion difference between virtual editions and recent in-person editions was highly significant (in-person proportion: 40%, virtual proportion : 48%, p-value = 3.4 × 10–4) suggesting that virtual conferences might increase women attendance.

The highly significant chi-square value (χ2 = 15.99, p = 0.00034) confirms the observed pattern, indicating that the likelihood of requiring surgical intervention increases with the severity of hydronephrosis.

Aortic valve morphogenesis was not surprisingly identified as being highly significant ( p = 3.44 × 10 −4 ).

Secretory cells still produced a lower albeit still highly significant similarity ( P = 3.48 × 10 −4 ).

There was a very highly significant difference in RFS between the multicentricity and unicentricity groups (P = 0.00035) ( Fig. 2 ), and laser vaporization in patients with multicentricity was associated with a 4.7-fold higher risk of recurrence/persistence (hazard ratio (HR): 4.71, 95% CI: 1.87 - 11.88, P = 0.001).

Extreme limiting dilution software analysis (ELDA) shows that the frequency of tumor-initiating cells is seven-fold higher in sh-FTO cells, with a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.00035) (Fig. 1g ).

TEWL analysis showed a highly significant improvement (−18.60%, p = 0.00035).

The mean Coeff_SL_PSQI_ACTI was 5.36, showing a highly significant difference from the null value (coeff. 1.0: t = 3.7947, df = 59, p = 0.0003508, 95% CI 3.059–7.651). 3.2 Group Analysis To address the primary research goal, two group analyses were performed: one for the differences between patients with insomnia with comorbid depressive disorders and those without and a second one for patients with insomnia with a BDI total score ≥14 (regardless of a history of depression) and those with insomnia and a BDI total score <14.

The association was highly significant in women (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.26–2.23, p = 3.54 × 10 −4 ), but not in men (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.85–1.53, p = 0.39). 2.5.

Comparison of the top ‘Vg1-like’ candidates from whole embryos (PMZ vs AMZ) with their counterparts from half-embryos shows highly significant correlation (Spearman's rank Rho = 0.73; p = 0.00036).

In particular, positions 2 and 3 show a pronounced decrease in the estimated latent score (approximately −0.76 and −1.34, respectively), both highly significant ( p = 3.6 × 10 −4 and p = 1.18 × 10 −7 ).

The analysis of samples of the minimum daily air and rock temperatures ( Table 2 ) showed that the temperature differences between the rock biotopes and the air temperature were highly significant (U = 46, p = 0.00036).

There was a highly significant within-family association between red/blue coat colour and deafness (p = 0.00036), with red coat colour segregating more frequently with deafness (COR = 0.48).

The results showed a highly significant difference (χ2 = 12.74, p = 0.00036).

Differences between elevations are highly significant (*** p = 0.0003657).

When splitting the IF group into two subgroups based on a median mTOR gene group differential expression of greater or less than 1.0, the difference in BMI reduction was highly significant (Group 1, mTOR group differential expression > 1.0, mean BMI ratio = 0.94; Group 2 BMI mTOR group differential expression < 1.0, mean BMI ratio = 0.89, p = 3.68E–04 U test; S Table 4 ).

On the other hand, we identified that the residual effects of MS can be modulated by THI, indicating a highly significant R×E THI interaction from URNM and MRNM ( p = 3.68E–04 and 1.60E–03 in M3 and M6).

For example, cell cycle response and clinical response to tamoxifen and letrozole in the P024 trial were discordant in over one-third of cases despite there being a highly significant correlation between the two types of response ( P = 0.00037) [ 2 ].

Introducing all two-way interactions markedly improved model fit (G 2 = 2.42, df = 1, p = 0.119), and the likelihood-ratio comparison against the main-effects model was highly significant (ΔG 2 = 18.37, Δdf = 3, p = 0.00037).

Quantitation of patterning levels confirmed that this difference is highly significant ( p ≤ 3.7 × 10 −4 ).

Total chiasma frequency among linearly and among convergently oriented trivalents was compared by means of an ANOVA and differences were highly significant (p = 0.000374).

A moderate association was detected between rs3825214 and AF ( P adj = 0.036, OR = 0.79) and a highly significant association was detected between the G allele of rs3825214 and lone AF ( P adj = 0.001, OR = 0.65; genotypic P = 3.75×10 −4 with a dominant model).

A one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test of ethanol concentration at the end of fermentation determined that ethanol production showed highly significant differences ( p = 0.000376).

Highly significant p values were obtained for rs17035816 ( p = 3.8 × 10 −4 ) and rs7688285 ( p = 7.6 × 10 −5 ) in GLRB .