“highly significant”

An unexpected finding is that gender also had a highly significant effect ( F = 14.66, p = 0.0002).

It was found that 90% of patients had a highly significant decrease in MO on immediate postoperative period ( P = 0.0002).

In Model 2 (NB Regression with Region), only episodes remained highly significant (β = 0.00505, SE = 0.00137, z = 3.69, p = 0.0002), while latitude became marginally significant ( p = 0.096); area lost significance ( p = 0.119).

The overall multivariate model was highly significant (likelihood ratio test p = 0.0002, Wald test p = 0.0001), with a concordance index of 0.679, indicating good prognostic discrimination.

Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy achieved a highly significant stone-free rate ( p = 0.0002), and the mean operative time, auxiliary procedures, and postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two groups.

This would be highly significant statistically ( p = 0.0002), but Steinmann’s description was limited to a schema, without narrative details, and Schwingenheuer’s was also brief.

This translated into a highly significant increased rate of survival within mAb treated mice compared to control mice (31283 p = 0.0002; 31259 p = 0.0004; 29044 p = 0.0003), as displayed in Fig 7C .

Moreover, multiple comparison analysis showed highly significant levels of β-III tubulin ( P = 0.0002), Nf-L ( P = 0.0403) and GFAP ( P < 0.015) in the subgroup of CSZ clozapine-treated.

Furthermore, they did a subgroup analysis on further cleaved and uncleaved embryos-’revealed that highly significant pregnancy rates were observed when ≥2 cleaved embryos were transferred (42.2%) than when 1 cleaved embryo (16.9%, P = 0.0002) or embryos without cleavage were transferred (3.2%, P ≤ 0.0001)’.

The difference between the cells infected with TTSuV1 and cells transfected with the unrelated DNA was highly significant at p = 0.0002 ( Fig. 2 ).

Lastly, distant metastases were found to be a highly significant predictor of mortality among patients with multiple recurrences of WDTC ( P = .0002).

The difference in visual grading was also statistically highly significant for the three groups in post stress ( p = 0.0002), and a similar difference was noted at rest ( p = 0.004) ( Table 4 ).

The total signs in February 2020 was 6.2% (10/162) and the total signs in the control group over all months was 1.4% (12/837), which is highly significant ( p =0.0002).

Microbial diversity within samples (alpha diversity) as measured by the Shannon index—which incorporates both microbial richness and evenness—showed highly significant differences across the four study time points ( p = 0.0002) when all dose groups were combined.

The CCDR Score demonstrated moderate negative correlations with VSMT (r = −0.347, p = 0.008) and GFC_VSMT (r = −0.368, p = 0.005), as well as stronger negative correlations with GFC_CCDR (Regression) (r = −0.628), GFC_CCDR (Discriminant) (r = −0.504), and the GFC_Health Problems Score (r = −0.471), all of which were highly significant ( p < 0.0002).

vivax infections (23–79%) was highly significant ( P = 0.0002), as was the variation in mean MOI (1.23–1.90); P = 0.0002.

The time of achievement of complete motor block between groups (clonidine group 8.7 ± 1.41 min, control group 13.7 ± 2.66 min), was less in clonidine group and was highly significant ( P = 0.0002).

fulviflamma was confirmed by a highly significant chi-square test (χ 2 = 14, df = 1, P<0.0002).

Furthermore, the presence of organ failure at the time of hospital admission according to the Sepsis-3 definition (35 patients out of the 60 patients) and the detection of bacteremia (30 patients) showed a highly significant association (Fisher’s test, p = 0.0002).

A permutation test with 10,000 randomizations confirmed that this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0002), indicating that the higher species richness in GS is unlikely to arise by chance.

All the correlations were highly significant ( p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively).

The binary logistic regression analysis using only IL-6 POD7 showed a highly significant regression coefficient (OR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.05–1.16; P = 0.0002), an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.75–0.97; P < 0.001), a Nagelkerke’s R 2 of 0.29, and a strong effect with Cohen’s f 2 of 0.40 (Fig. 1 A).

The differences between the populations are highly significant for both Cmax values, as determined by 3-group permutation ANOVA (p < 0.0002 for both) and pairwise Wilcoxon test for sparse vs dense (p = 2e-18 and p = 9e-14 for Cmax = 90 nM and 900 nM, respectively).

There was a highly significant difference of the mean internal carpal tunnel ratio between male patients and controls (male patients: 0.42 ± 0.05; male controls: 0.34 ± 0.04, P = 0.0002) as well as between female patients and controls (female patients: 0.39 ± 0.06; female controls: 0.35 ± 0.04, P = 0.034). 3.1.2.

Based on statistical analysis, results show a strong highly significant influence effect of the harvesting year ( p = 0.0002) on DON content, which is more than doubled for the harvesting year 2020 (mean of 3746 μg kg −1 vs. 1463 μg kg −1 ).