“highly significant”

There were highly significant differences (P < 0001) between the analysed mean Hg, As and turbidity levels and the permissible levels in surface water with the potential of affecting ecosystem services including water for drinking, water for recreational, water for irrigational, and water for aqua culture purposes.

"STR completion rate" was a highly significant factor in both SNP rate models (p < 0.0001), and "STR concordance rate" and "GQ score" were significant factors in the SNP concordance rate model (p = 0.0008 and 0.045, respectively).

Residuals of tick observations were likewise highly significant [estimate = 0.8 ± 0.04 (SE), z ‐value = 18.7, p < 0.0001], further highlighting that tick observations contain unique variation beyond seasonality influencing disease case numbers.

There was a highly significant effect of suggestion ( F 2,312 = 585.8; p < .0001), a marginally significant effect of hypnosis ( F 1,312 = 3.6; p = .060) and no significant effect of group ( F 1,312 = 2.6; p = .11).

Unlike other developed models, the highly significant HHV model ( P < 0.0001) for the solvolysis process only contained the independent terms.

The main effects of stimulus intensity, recording site, and their interactions were all highly significant, F4,152 = 96.29, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.82; F2,76 = 68.75, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.73; and F8,304 = 5.06, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.72.

In lung adenocarcinoma, the most predictive signature generated from the Kim and colleagues ( 38 ) dataset revealed no association with survival when derived from ldvae [ P = 0.25 or −log 10 ( P ) = 0.6], whereas the BBKNN signature showed a highly significant predictive capacity [ P = 1e−4 or −log 10 ( P ) = 4; Fig. 5B ].

sPCA analysis revealed highly significant global (p = 0.0001) but non-significant (p = 0.4327) local spatial structures (Supplementary Fig. 2 ), indicating strong signatures of between population separations.

7B-3 , right panel, mixed ANOVA revealed no significant effect of group: F (1, 240) = 0.5557, not significant after FDR correction, but highly significant effects of time: F (15, 240) = 8.4108, P < 0.0001, and interaction between group and time: F (15, 240) = 3.1105, P = 0.0001].

Multiplex analysis demonstrated highly significant differences in concentration levels of different inflammatory markers in SF samples from knee OA patients (Kruskal-Wallis test, **** p < 0.0001).

CQ GREEN uptake rates between CQS and CQR strains were statistically highly significant for both the cytosol (p < 0.0001) and DV (p < 0.0001).

Comparison between the maximum ratio observed in control and mutant animals showed that this difference in cyt/nuc ratio was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001)( Fig 3F ).

The z-test for the pooled estimate was highly significant (Z=5.13, P<0.0001).

Interestingly, for patients with UC, highly significant results concerning vitamin D substitution were only observed in the winter season ( p < 0.0001), whereas in the summer season, the difference was less significant ( p = 0.02).

Condition factor was determined for each fish sampled throughout the study and was significantly affected by date (F (5,198) = 3.423, p < 0.01) and the interaction between date and photoperiod regime (F (10, 198) = 3.159, p < 0.001) with a highly significant decline observed following transfer from SP to LL from 1.371 ± 0.037 to 1.12 ± 0.016 (p < 0.0001).

Of the 378 pairwise tests conducted among 28 kelp populations, 370 were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and 6 were significant ( P < 0.05) after FDR correction ( Supplementary Table S5 ).

A highly significant association was seen between PSA recurrence and elevated SPDEF expression (P<0.0001; Fig. 4A ).

The observed effect of trans-4-tert-butylcyclohexanol was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

There was also highly significant positive correlation between serum IMA and MDA ( r = 0.843,P < 0.0001), whereas there were significant negative correlations between serum IMA and uric acid ( r = −0.237,P < 0.05), and albumin ( r = −0.326,P < 0.05).

In the resulting GLMM we found a significant difference in infection rate between female and male bat flies (averaged over species; X 1 2 = 4.56, P = 0.0327, higher in females), and highly significant differences in infection rates among bat fly species (averaged over sexes; X 2 2 = 52.83, P < 0.0001).

The genotype×time interaction (GEN.T) was highly significant in both experiments for SCC (GEN.T: TPE I, P <0.0001 and TPE II, P =0.0088) and for RF (GEN.T: TPE I, P <0.0001 and TPE II, P <0.0001).

Treatment had a highly significant effect on disease control (F(3,8) = 1553, p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.9983).

The model’s intercept had an estimate of 93.53 with a standard error of 0.48, yielding a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

Most of the questions of patient satisfaction were statistically highly significant ( p <0.0001).

The difference in rates between officers and enlisted personnel was highly significant for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and the aggregate of all forms of viral hepatitis (P < 0.0001) but was not significant for hepatitis, type unspecified (P = 0.099).