Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 2.81 × 10 −590.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While ungrouping identical subclones reduced hemimethylation values at both the Gtl2 - and IG-DMRs, from 31.8 to 29.8 and 8.4 to 6.1%, respectively (Additional file 3 : Table S2, Additional file 4 : Table S3), the difference in hemimethylation levels between the primary IG-DMR and the secondary Gtl2 -DMR remains highly significant as assessed using a Chi-squared test of independence ( P = 2.81 × 10 −59 ).
highly significantp = 8.21 e − 580.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For faces, the comparison between w -based and VGGFace-1-based encoders shows no significant difference (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = −0.2859, p = 0.78) but we found highly significant differences when comparing w -based encoders with VGGFace-3 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 16.5817, p = 8.21 e − 58) and with VGGFace-5 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 15.0820, p = 1.17 e − 48).
highly significantP =1.82E-570.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, we note that there is a highly significant co-occurrence of 9p21.3 deletion (arm or focal) and 9p24.1 deletion (arm or focal) ( P =1.82E-57), and focal deletion of 9p21.3 and 9p24.1 ( P =2.03E-07), suggesting that the effects seen for 9p21.3 loss (e.g., on PD-L1 expression) are likely due to simultaneous co-deletion of 9p24.1. 9p24.1 SCNA Associations With TME Phenotype in Independent HPV – HNSC Validation Cohort.
highly significantP = 4 × 10 –560.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This difference in the number of place fields was highly significant across the recorded population of CA1 and CA3 neurons (Fig. 2a , bottom; Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P = 4 × 10 –56 )—in each of the three different large-scale tunnels (see the individual bats and tunnels in Fig. 2a , top, and Extended Data Fig. 3a ).
highly significantP < 10 −550.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Functional analyses pinpoint shared and distinct biological processes that protect yeast cells from Al, Ga, and In toxicity We noted that there was a highly significant overlap between the gene-sets conferring resistance to the three metals tested (Fig. 3 A): the overlap was 26% (62 of 242 genes) between Al and Ga ( P < 10 −55 ), 25% (77 of 304 genes) between Ga and In ( P < 10 −64 ), and 34% (107 of 312 genes) between Al and In ( P < 10 −97 ).