“highly significant”

For instance, decreasing the incubation temperature from 37 to 30°C or room temperature, had a highly significant effect on the total aerobic count for samples collected from the low care zone ( p < 0.0001).

Better correlation was achieved when using the LS system compared with the IVIS system, although in both cases the correlation was highly significant ( r = 0.9223, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.7992, P < 0.0001, respectively).

Moreover, we found that it was correlated (using Spearman correlation) with the GC content of the region (corr = 0.13), the fraction of region that was protein coding (corr = 0.26) and the level of gene expression (only available for 71% of genes; corr = 0.20), all highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Standard mean difference (SMD) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all comparisons (Stable_MCI versus MCI_AD: SMD [95%-CI] Aβ(1-42) = 1.19 [0.96,1.42]; T-tau = −1.03 [−1.24,−0.82]; P-tau = −1.03 [−1.47,−0.59]; HC versus MCI_AD: SMD Aβ(1-42) = 1.73 [1.39,2.07]; T-tau = −1.13 [−1.33,−0.93]; P-tau = −1.10 [−1.23,−0.96]).

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant time × treatment interaction ( p < 0.0001), indicating that treatment effects were time-dependent. 2.3.

The level of significance ( p -value) for each test is indicated in the figures using the following notation: ns ( p > 0.05)—non-significant, * (0.01 < p ≤ 0.05)—significant, ** (0.001 < p ≤ 0.01)—very significant, *** (0.0001 < p ≤ 0.001)—highly significant, and **** ( p ≤ 0.0001)—extremely significant. 5.

Geographical Differences in Skull Shape, Diversity and Size Highly significant shape differences ( p < 0.0001) were detected among all areas, except between Arctic localities (High Arctic vs.

Whereas the original data analysis reported a highly significant effect ( P < 0.0001), generalized mixed-effects models with a random effect for name indicates that the effect is not robust, neither with the data from the general public (b = −0.108 [log odd units], z = −1.712, P = 0.087) nor with the data from elected officials (b = −0.065, z = −1.432, P = 0.155). * While this does not mean that we should accept the null hypothesis, it shows that the study is underpowered.

Both platform and nozzle temperatures were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and multiple interaction terms (X 1 X 2 , X 1 X 3 ) were significant, demonstrating a non-linear coupling between thermal boundary conditions and dose accuracy.

For all nine samples, highly significant SCF determinations were obtained ( p < 0.0001).

We found highly significant evidence that polytrauma patients have more than twice as many days off work (representing an increase of 120 % of the average days of work absence; p < 0.0001) compared with non-polytrauma patients.

All correlations between the FIQR total score and MAU instruments utility scores were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with magnitudes larger than 0.5.

Experiments that supplemented carotenoids rather than correlations with concentrations of carotenoids in blood resulted in significantly larger effect sizes (p = 0.006), but an analysis without the supplementation studies still yielded a highly significant overall effect size ( table 2 , p<0.0001).

wheat landraces Ethiopian tetraploid wheat association analysis yellow rust resistance 90 K wheat SNP array Highly significant differences were observed among accessions and accessions by environments ( P < 0.0001) in ANOVA analyses for stripe rust response in the field tests, but no significant difference was detected among environments.

1 ) of both kidneys were greater in SCD patients as compared to controls, which was highly significant ( p <0.0001) for both the right and left sides.

Figure 11 shows that the model exhibits a noisy but clear trend of higher MRs in regions with low LHI and lower MRs in regions with high LHI, as confirmed by the weak but highly significant correlation ( r = −0.228, p < 0.0001).

Mortality analysis ( Figure 2 ) Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower all-cause mortality in the HIF group compared to the ESA group, with a highly significant log-rank test ( p < 0.0001), indicating improved survival among HIF users.

Survival curve analysis revealed highly significant differences between these groups in the training set (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4E ).

Moreover, 40 subjects with samples from two subsequent years showed a highly significant (p<0.0001) increase in cathelicidin concentration from visit one to visit two.

The content of each individual element, except Fe, showed highly significant differences between the inner structure and the surface (results from Wilcoxon‐test: p < .0001*, for p ‐values see Table A1 ).

Interestingly, the expression of both markers increased with tumor stage and grade, with significant correlation to tumor stage: p =0.001 and p =.002, respectively, and a highly significant correlation with tumor grade ( p =0.0001 for both) ( Table 2 ).

Indeed, based on this ratio, fim2 expression in HB101 exerted a highly significant positive impact on biofilm formation on both surfaces ( P < 0.0001 in each case).

As per Mantel–Haenszel Chi-square for linear trend, the relative risk of comorbidity was 72 times in patients with severe disease and 18 times in patients with moderate disease as compared to patients with mild disease, and the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

In the active rTMS group, the mean number of correct answers on the PRM test increased by 4.54 ± 2.98 from baseline to week 8, while the correct number in the sham group decreased slightly (-0.92 ± 2.72) and the difference between these changes was highly significant (mean 5.46 ± 0.92, 95%CI: 3.43–7.14, F = 33.3, df = 137, P < 0.0001, effect size = 0.474) (Table 2 ).

In that study, Se-HBV’s relation to toxic effects of CH 3 Hg exposures was highly significant ( F = 161.0, p < 0.0001) and consistent (adjusted R 2 = 0.735).