“highly significant”

Fig 2b supports this hypothesis: ANOVA tests confirm a highly significant effect for those who received help ( F = 26.89 and P <0.0001 – an increase of two times more shared onions per soup delivered) compared to those who did not receive help ( F = 0.61 and P = 0.44).

Specifically, rmpA , rmpA2 , and iucA showed the strongest associations, with absolute differences in reporting frequency exceeding 20 percentage points and highly significant statistical support ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

The diagnostic powers of C1M, C3M, C5M and C6M were highly significant with an AUROC > 85% ( P < 0.0001).

The statistical difference between IDH- m/w groups (Table 2 ) using Mann Whitney test was highly significant for KYN ( P < 0.0001), NLR ( P = 0.0002), TIMP-1 ( P = 0.0405) and hTERT ( P < 0.0001).

Interestingly, the correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.704), average scleral thickness being the arithmetical mean of the scleral thickness in each of the four quadrants (Fig. 2b ).

In addition, MT Pre1 showed highly significant correlations with A ( r = 0.945 and p < 0.0001), C ( r = 0.774 and p = 0.0004), and D 5 ( r = 0.686 and p = 0.003), but not with tau ( r = −0.129 and p = 0.635) (Table 2 ).

All of the above findings were highly significant and had P < 0.0001 values [ 38 ].

Group I and II drugs showed highly significant effect on lymphedema, lymphadenitis, lymphangitis, pain, tenderness, heaviness, deformity, fever and rigors ( P <0.0001).

For Coxiella sp., a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) was found between the adult and larval stages of the ticks.

Lactate AMP showed a highly significant dose effect ( p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant effect ( P ≤ .0001) of the basal medium on percent embryo formation, with highest values observed on the MM3 (modified) medium and reduced values on the others.

Multiple regression analysis of the experimental data yielded the following second-order polynomial equation (Equation (1)), which describes the relationship between the response variable and the independent variables: (1) Oil yield (%) = 33.84 + 0.5783A + 0.8342B + 0.4008C + 0.8633D + 0.5550AB + 0.2425AC + 0.1675AD + 0.6150BC − 0.2725BD + 0.2550CD − 2.08A 2 − 1.31B 2 − 2.09C 2 − 1.32D 2 As shown in Table 3 , the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit test was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model is statistically valid and well-fitted to the experimental data.

There was a trend for a relationship between advancing age and reductions in HOMA-IR (R 2 = 0.06; P = 0.09) ( Figure 5F ), with a highly significant correlation between HOMA-IR before RE-T and RE-T–induced reductions in HOMA-IR (R 2 = 0.34; P < 0.0001), irrespective of age.

As can be observed, a high F-value indicates that the simulated models had a highly significant difference for every answer ( p < 0.0001).

cerevisiae ARSs and this degree of overlap is highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001, permutation test, see Methods) (Supplemental Data set S5).

Also, the random effects were not centered on 0, with highly significant deviations ( p < 0.0001) for the apparent central volume of distribution (V2/F), the apparent peripheral volume of distribution (V3/F), and T lag ; and the largest deviation corresponding to a 43% higher V2/F.

Highly significant differences ( P <0.0001; Mann–Whitney) were seen between concentrations of these variables in patients with metastatic disease compared with localised disease ( Figure 1 ) with median values (IQR) respectively of 22.2 (4.2–111) vs 5.7 (0.6–11.5) mg l −1 for CRP, 189.2 (114.8–303.4) vs 82.3 (575.5–131.1) μ g l −1 for OPN and 186.4 (89.6–336.2) vs 102.5 (61.6–153.9) μ g l −1 for CA9.

Analysis of FSH and INB levels in the groups we defined, revealed highly significant differences among the 4 groups for both males ( P < 0.0001, ANOVA), and females ( P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001 for FSH and INB respectively) (Figure 1 ), as expected for the study design.

Two-way ANOVA analysis of the hemorrhage area for the FUS Intensity groups indicates a highly significant main effect of FUS intensity (p < 0.0001).

In the other age groups, we observed a more moderate but still highly significant rise ( p < 0.0001) in antibody levels (2.9, 2.9, 1.8, and 1.66, in the age group 0–15 years, 31–45 years, 46–60 years, and >60 years, respectively) ( Table 2 ).

2B ), and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; unpaired t -test).

The reduction during 1 to 24 h was more extensive for Nep4 sperm than normal sperm; indeed, a highly significant interaction factor was found between males and time points ( Fig. 8 ; F = 102.4, d.f. = (1, 66), P < 0.0001).

The type of basal medium was also highly significant (F Value = 67; p<0.0001), though much less so than PGR, with more shoots regenerated on MS medium than WPM.

Compared to both the healthy controls and the individuals with insulin resistance alone, patients with diabetes but without insulin resistance exhibited a highly significant upregulation (p<0.0001) in both their IL-10 mRNA levels within PBMCs and the corresponding IL-10 protein levels circulating in their serum.

MANOVA of PC1–3 scores shows a highly significant effect of species (Wilks’ λ = 0.56, F 5,197 = 8.26, p < 0.0001), day (Wilks’ λ = 0.15, F 1,197 = 357.45, p < 0.0001), and the species x day interaction (Wilks’ λ = 0.80, F 5,197 = 3.00, p < 0.001) on mandibular shape.