The highly significant correlation ( r =0.81, n =59, P <0.0001) between the Qamdo and regional residual series indicates the representativeness of the station record for larger spatial scales.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In addition, while CRP and Neopterin showed a highly significant decline post-treatment regardless of strain ( p < 0.0001 for all), B 2 M showed differential decline depending on strain ( p = 0.0153 for Mtb and p = 0.0048 for Maf ) and levels were still significantly higher at 6 months in Maf compared to Mtb infected subjects ( p = 0.0051).
Kras Low mice exhibited ∼26% recombination, Kras Mod mice ∼46%, and Kras High mice nearly complete recombination (∼98%) with all comparisons highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The improvement between the two visits was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table 1 ).
The one-way ANOVA conducted for testing significance of the mean iH O among the six populations investigated was highly significant: F 5,172 = 31.92, p < 0.0001).
The RPE was strongly positively correlated with consumptive indicators (e.g., fatigue, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS); r = 0.51) but moderately negatively correlated with restorative indicators (e.g., sleep quality; r = −0.45), with the difference between these groups being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Temperature (T) and aging time (D) showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001), while humidity (H) also demonstrated a significant influence, with all three main factors falling below the 0.05 threshold.
Pearson’s correlation analysis ( n = 45) showed a powerful and highly significant positive correlation between daily As intake and the hazard index (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001), indicating that arsenic is the primary contributor to HI from the consumption of these dietary supplements.
Baseline CSF apoB levels showed highly significant associations with t‐tau and P‐tau ( R 2 = 0.23 and 0.28, both P < .0001, Figure 2 ).
Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis confirmed highly significant relationships of both techniques to age (both P < 0.0001), and MRI was also significantly related to heart rate ( P = 0.006) but Vicorder was not.
Whole mite extract responses also differed between groups, with Aca s exhibiting a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001), while Tyr p showed a moderate but notable difference ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 2a ). 3.3.
Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation between Nat-LTP and Wt-LTP (R 2 = 0.9491, p < 0.0001, n = 27; Fig. 2 , large panel).
The correlations between both phases were highly significant (Student’s t -test), as can be observed for V1/V2 ( Figure 8 D; r = 0.965, p < 10 −4 ), d1/d2 ( Figure 8 E; r = 0.898, p < 10 −4 ), V1/d1 ( Figure 8 F; r = 0.675, p = 0.002), and V2/d2 ( Figure 8 G; r = 0.753, p = 0.0003).
When all species are considered there is a highly significant correlation between the mean number of binding sites per protein and biological complexity (r = 0.7000, P < 0.0001; Figure 4a ).
Tests of equality of group means showed that the increase in the number of CD8+ cells and IFN-γ expression levels in irradiated tumors were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and that either measure was 100% accurate in predicting treatment response.
When hair follicle harvested from lower occipital donor area of Group ’A’ and Group ’B’ patients were compared and we observed highly significant statistical difference between these two groups (df = 10, t = 18.77, P < 0.0001) [ Table 2 ] Average FTR from total scalp donor area in Group ’A’ and Group ’B’ patients was 5.10 and 3.10, respectively [ Table 4 ].
The overall correlation coefficient observed between C6 and C6 Plus was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; r = 0.992; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982–0.997).
Due to the large number of variables, non-parametric tests were consistently used and a statement regarding statistical significance was only made in the case of highly significant p-values ( p ≤ 0.0001).
When these numbers were analyzed, the statistic for the pooled data was not significant (G P = 0.05, 1 df, P = 0.8307), but the heterogeneity statistic was highly significant (G H = 39.2, 9 df, P < 0.0001), as was the total statistic (G T = 39.2, 10 df, P < 0.0001).
This finding was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The difference between the two species is also highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with the main contribution to the difference from +4 sites following UAG and UGA.
Comparison between the maximum ratio observed in control and mutant animals showed that this difference in cyt/nuc ratio was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001)( Fig 3F ).
A similar and highly significant association was also observed between enhanced expression of HLA-DR and CD4 on the classical subset ( r = 0.9483, P = 0.0001) within the LTNP group ( Table 3 ).
In sharp contrast to the lack of discernible directional preference in the horizontal chambers, we found that N2 dauer larvae demonstrated an enhanced and highly significant preference for upward migration in the vertical chambers under these conditions (average vertical location = +1.63, n = 4,358 worms, 12 trials; p < 0.0001, all comparisons) ( Figure 2 A and 2B).
The difference between left cue and right cue conditions was highly significant (χ 2 = 16.1, p < 0.0001).