Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Controlling for weight and food intake, differences in CD11d mRNA abundance comparing controls and high-Ca mice were not statistically significant, but the reduction in CD11d expression in mice fed high-Ca + NFDM remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lastly, analysis of the relative usage of pAs in 182 genes that displayed significant modulation of at least two alternative pAs ( Supplementary Table S7 ) highlighted a highly significant negative correlation between the abundance of the two APA isoforms for most genes (92.85%; r = –0.8936, P <0.0001, Pearson correlation; Figure 2F ), thus confirming the effect on transcript lengthening induced by HT.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, 49 cases of co-infection were observed and 10 cases of infection with only Paramarteilia , a result that is highly significant (Chi-Square; χ 2 = 39.4, df = 1 P < 0.0001) and consistent with that found in a previous survey 13 .
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Postmortem histopathological analyses at 35 days post‐SCI confirmed improved outcomes with higher IVIg doses, with highly significant reductions in lesion volumes following treatment with either 0.5 g/kg (31% reduction; P < 0.0001), 1 g/kg (34% reduction; P < 0.0001), or 2 g/kg IVIg (27% reduction; P < 0.0001).
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected, comparisons between the parental viruses and the chimeric viruses were all highly significant ( p <0.0001), with the exception of the comparison between the IE parental virus and IE/IAB chimera, for which the IE strain had a less notable infectious advantage than the chimera ( p <0.0071).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Hence, when looking specifically at peritumoral tumor cell clusters as a surrogate of glial migration and infiltration, the average results between control condition (8 animals) and all chemokine groups were highly significant: CXCL10 (7 animals): 37 vs. 7 ( p < 0.0001), CCL2 (9 animals): 37 vs. 28 ( p = 0.0258), CCL11 (8 animals): 37 vs. 25 ( p = 0.0003) and the combination (7 animals): 37 vs. 24 ( p = 0.0070) ( Figure 3 D). 2.2.2.