“highly significant”

Summed fluorescence values relative to BF long-latency activity ( Figure 2 c) indicated a highly significant difference across the four groups, illustrating a strong reduction of neuronal assembly magnitude with maturation (F (3,120) = 9.613, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA).

Additionally, diagnosis of colon cancer with both sDC-SIGN and sDC-SIGNR was highly significant (P<0.0001).

The effects on wound closure at 24 h has shown that LMWHA + Secre and MMWHA+Secre solutions is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to CTR, LMWHA and Secre.

The results presented in Table S3 showed that the model was highly significant (F-value = 69.52, p < 0.0001).

As shown in Table S10 , the model had F = 10.65 and was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack of fit was not significant ( p = 0.0652 > 0.05).

When comparing MD incidence between the birds challenged by Ikaros WT and Ikaros Mut, there were highly significant differences in MD incidence for both replicates 1 and 2 depending on infection with the different Ikaros alleles ( p < 0.0001 for both replicates).

There were highly significant differences between the classes, with initially Robust participants surviving longest and the initially Frail shortest (log rank test = 190.2, 3 df, p < .0001).

However, terms for IL2 in addition to IL2×CSF2 produced highly significant models with coefficient p-values<1e-4.

The model for the time spent close to the feeding station for the animals that sensitised was highly significant explaining 60% of the variance (GLM, F 23, 111 = 9.12, p < 0. 0001, r 2 adj = 0.60).

The linear correlations of L ↓ and K ↓ with T are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all the five reanalysis products.

The predicted model developed for catechin (Y 1 ) was as follows: Analysis of variance for predicted models implied that the model was highly significant (F-value 20.13, P < 0.0001) with a good coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.98).

The smoking status of the patients was available for 54% of patients, and a highly significant correlation in ADA levels was seen between ever smokers ( n = 84) and never smokers ( n = 63) ( p -value = 0.0001) ( Figure 12 ), a pattern that could also be noted over time ( Figure S14 ).

Network events resulted in a highly significant positive shift in [Cl − ] i ( P < 0.0001, t -test, n = 75 network events from 16 neurons) and an acidic shift in pH i ( P < 0.0001, t -test, Figures 4A,B ).

Transition-type was highly significant [ F (3, 27) = 130.5, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.35], and SOA was also highly significant [ F (3, 27) = 93.046, p < 0.0001, ε = 0.586, η 2 = 0.12].

Regression analysis showed that shortness of breath was a highly significant ( P <0.0001) predictor of impact items.

Results OFV difference between Model 1 and 2 was highly significant (ΔOFV = 37.1, p < 0.0001).

The overall mean scores showed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) improvement in the post-test scores of all the participants compared to their pre-test scores with a mean difference of 25.5 ± 14.7% between pre- and post-test scores.

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant correlation between pVNT and VNT titres (Spearman’s rank correlation r = 0.86; p < 0.0001).

In contrast, 9.5% of the total variance was attributed to differences among geographic groups within clades, demonstrating highly significant genetic structure ( p < 0.0001).

At this stringency level, we observed highly significant ( P < 0.0001) correlations between the promoter and ECs for the number of mutations ( R = 0.854) across the 1,492 Kronos mutant lines shared between the two studies ( SI Appendix , Table S2 ).

Depression symptoms The analysis of data using the Mann–Whitney U -test revealed that after 12 months of active treatment, the general level of depression symptoms significantly decreased from 21 to 14 ( Table 2 ) (median decrease 3, P < 0.0001) among Polish patients and showed a highly significant reduction from 22 to 12 (median decrease 7, P < 0.0001) in the Germany patients.

We found a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.0001) in the invasiveness index between them.

ANOVA showed that both main effects and their interaction were highly significant (treatment: F (3,1176) = 56.098, p < 0.0001; time: F (5,1176) = 183.9, p < 0.0001; interaction: F (15,1176) = 85.18, p < 0.0001).

Interestingly, the highly significant increase in the expression of several genes of the HSPG biosynthetic machinery observed at 2 months was followed by a decrease at 4 months ( Figure 1d ) ( p < 0.0001).

2B ), with a highly significant Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.49 ( P = 0.0001, n = 2155 voxels in five animals).