“highly significant”

Abnormal renal function tests (higher levels of serum urea and creatinine) were reported in our study and the difference was found to be highly significant (urea (p<0.0001) and creatinine (p=0.0019)) between the controls and cases.

According to this model, we can deduce that the regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, time after collection was a highly significant factor contributing to stability in FGM concentrations for both assays (cortisol EIA, d.f. = 100, F = 6.17, P < 0.0001; and corticosterone RIA, d.f. = 100, F = 5.4, P = 0.0002).

A highly significant difference in Lp (a) levels was observed between normal coronaries vs. single-vessel disease, double-and triple-vessel disease ( P < 0.0001).

Individual p -values, however, were reported for 4 only, deemed highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Comparing the two groups in a mixed model the blocking was highly significant (p < 0.0001) and a significant difference was present during all time points investigated.

The response surface quadratic model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the lake of fit (lake of fit = 0.0710 > 0.05) was not significant.

All main effects such as genotype, trial, and their interaction, were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all studied traits.

The results showed a highly significant difference in MOIs among the five groups (HC group and model groups at different lesion stages) ( F (4, 29) = 209.3, p < 0.0001).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with an F-value of 32.68, and the lack of fit was non-significant ( p = 0.3150), confirming the model’s adequacy.

There was a highly significant association for all species ( p < 0.0001) between the evaluation by CaV and SYBR/PI used as reference dye.

The overall multivariate log-rank test was highly significant (chi-squared = 71.16, p < 0.0001), confirming significant differences in conversion-free survival across dose groups.

The difference between NK cell cytotoxicity from patients (samples were taken before therapy) and healthy donors was highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

The clustering observed was found to be highly significant, and we identified 159 unexpectedly large (at least 400 Kb; p<1e-04) clusters of divergent regions with a median size of 800 Kb ( Figure 3 ; Table S2 ).

Statistical analysis confirmed that this reduction is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a pronounced structural distinction between both fiber populations.

On another hand, the impact of stone size on the stone-free status and the need for one or more sessions was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Discrimination based on NEXN expression was highly significant within the data set of Taylor et al , however in this case low gene expression was associated with poor prognosis (log-rank P≤0.0001).

The p-value indicates highly significant **** p < 0.0001 while p > 0.05 is considered not significant.

The SEM results showed that the mediating effect of psychological capital on happiness was partly transmitted through social capital: the total effect of psychological capital on happiness was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), as was the total effect of social capital on happiness ( p < 0.0001); however, the coefficient for psychological capital was greater than that for social capital.

Study effect was highly significant in univariate analysis ( P < 0.0001), but no longer in the final model after adjustment of the covariate effects ( P ≥ 0.02).

The correlation between log 10 building mortalities (m) and log 10 population size (N) was highly significant ( r = 0.57, P <0.0001, n = 147), as was the correlation between log 10 tower mortalities and log 10 population size ( r = 0.43, P <0.0001, n = 188) ( Figure 1 ).

The neural response change at the target rate of 4 Hz is highly significant (bootstrap across participants, p <10 −4 ) ( Figure 3A ).

Statistical significance for comparisons of drug responses across different numbers of cells per spot was determined using ordinary one‐way ANOVA, with highly significant differences ( **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01) for comparisons between different groups, while “NS” indicates a nonsignificant statistical difference between the data groups.

decipiens , these differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (see Data Set S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5315135.v1 ).

This effect was not seen in Ewing's sarcoma; ch14.18/CHO had minimal cytotoxicity at the same concentration against Ewing's sarcoma irrespective of GD2 expression; the difference between the killing of Kelly or LAN1 and GD2 bright DC-ES6, was highly significant ( p =<0.0001).