Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The activity of AMPs and Tobramycin against preformed biofilms resulted to be similar in 5 out of 6 strains tested, causing a highly significant reduction of biofilm viability compared to the controls (biofilm not exposed; p < 0.0001), regardless of the concentrations tested (Figure 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Nonparametric one-way ANOVA with repeated measures design by ranks (Friedman tests) revealed highly significant changes during the oGTT (AcG: p < 0.0001; UnG: p = 0.0007; ratio: p = 0.0087), but as specified by post-hoc Dunn’s Tests, in contrast to our expectations, we did not observe a strong decrease in circulating ghrelin levels after glucose ingestion.
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A multivariate analysis adjusted for etiology, site, age, and weight in comparison with ideal weight showed that in both young children and in the older population, time spent with plasma FVIII <1 IU/dL was a highly significant predictor of the rate of all bleeding ( P <0.0001 for young children; P <0.05 for older patients) and the rate of joint bleeds ( P <0.0001 for young children; P <0.02 for older patients).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The two‐way ANOVA on square‐root arcsine transformed data showed highly significant effects of dose ( F 1,32 = 26.79, p < .0001) and of the interaction between dose and accession ( F 1,32 = 20.39; p < .0001), but not of accession ( F 1,32 < 0.42; p = .52), and the residuals from this model did not deviate from normality ( W = 0.95, p > .12).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results showed a significant enhancing effect of MEP in the affected hemisphere (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.02–0.74; P = 0.04) without heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%) ( Figure 4(a) ) and a highly significant suppressing effect of MEP in the unaffected hemisphere (SMD = −0.83, 95% CI = −1.13 to −0.54; P < 0.0001), without significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 18%) ( Figure 4(b) ). 3.3.2. rMTs in Both Hemispheres Four studies ( N = 121) [ 26 , 28 , 32 , 34 ] assessed the effect of LF-rTMS on rMT of the affected hemisphere by using the fixed-effect model that showed a large suppressing effect size (SMD = −1.00, 95% CI = −1.90 to −0.11; P = 0.03; I 2 = 79%) ( Figure 4(c) ).