In the Kruskal–Wallis analysis, the Ma QTL was supported with a highly significant (P < 0.0001) value of the K statistic, 15.9 for malic acid content.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Rat control on the farm A highly significant difference (χ 2 = 33.4543 p < 0.0001) was observed in the number of T. gondii positive animals among the properties that use cats for rat control (n = 239; 20 positive animals; prevalence 1.73%) and those that do not use them (n = 885; 12 positive 1 animals; prevalence 1.03%).
For the remaining data, we observed a highly significant effect of interaural correlation on ITD thresholds ( F (1,19) = 30.25, P < 0.0001).
Results in Table 2 show highly significant relative humidity effect on both D. minutus reproductive capacity (F=388.91, DF=4, 45; p<0.0001) and adult lifespan (F=464.70, DF=4, 45; p<0.0001).
Relationship between geographic, morphological, and molecular affinities There was a highly significant association between Nei's ( 1972 ) genetic distance and geographic distance ( r 2 = 0.370, P < 0.0001) indicating that isolation-by-distance and genetic drift is an important process in the E. globulus species complex.
What was clear was the distinctly different trends for CHX versus Act D, indicating a highly significant change in relative localisation and clustering of genomes in the presence of CHX versus Act D (p-value < 0.0001; D statistic = 0.52).
Given the large sample size and the highly significant X2 of the maximum likelihood ratio (p < 0.0001), this model was judged to have adequate fit for determining association.
The differences in collagen quantification were highly significant between all groups ( P < 0.0001), with SNAC treated animals showing a reduction of 34.4% in the collagen occupied area when compared with the NASH group ( Figure 3 ).
On the other hand, the differences were highly significant (P<0.0001) in 2 of the 3 markers and the three different proliferation biomarkers all point into the same direction.
When we compare the average impact factor of the 56 scientific publications that were echoed by newspapers (17.1±2.1 mean ± SEM) to that of the 56 publications that were not echoed (6.4±1.0 mean ± SEM), the difference is highly significant (unpaired t test: p<0.0001).
The regression model was highly significant as indicated by its P value (P < 0.0001); the P value indicated that the regression model had a high degree of fit.
In contrast, the TB cohort was much more sensitive to host-filtering stringency: both TB-negative and TB-positive groups exhibited markedly higher non-host fractions under the relaxed mode than under the strict mode, with highly significant within-sample differences ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 A).
This reduction in restriction proved highly significant in the other two groups, were we observed a 2.24 and 2.49 fold increase in the AHI-156 and CHI group compared to CG respectively (both p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 3 C).
Data analyzed revealed that there was a significant effect of the forward speeds (FS) (p < 0.05), a highly significant effect for elevator velocities (ES) (p < 0.0001), and a highly significant effect for cutting knives speeds “CKS” (p < 0.01) on the collecting efficiency.
The analysis revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) for environment, replicates within environments, lines (genotypes), and the genotype-by-environment interaction.
This difference was highly significant, also when correcting for small difference between the sequences at pre-test, t (14) = 5.749, p<0.0001.
Both serum and urine I-FABP levels had a highly significant positive correlation with each other ( r = 0.406 P < 0.0001).
Subrahmanyam, who found that the recovery time in Group B was 5.86 ± 1.3 min and in Group F was 3.33 ± 0.8 min, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).[ 20 ] In our study, although sedation scores were higher in butorphanol group as compared to fentanyl group, the majority of the patients of butorphanol group were responding to verbal commands at 1⁄2 h postoperatively.
VE/VO 2 showed a highly significant difference during the first 20 s of recovery ( p = 0.0001, r = 0.834, 95% CI: −5.05 to −3.06), whereas no significant differences were observed during the subsequent 20–40 s and 40–60 s intervals ( p > 0.05).
The “Model F -value” was highly significant, with only a 0.01% likelihood of being influenced by noise ( P < 0.0001) (Table S2 ).
We found a highly significant negative relationship (p < 0.0001) between the proximity of consecutive foraging sites at pair level and the mean invertebrate abundance, suggesting that snowfinches return to the same patch also when the mean invertebrate abundance is high, while the opposite trend was found in relationship to invertebrate richness.
A highly significant (P < 0.0001) decrease in MWCNT lung burden with post-exposure time was determined.
The mean body mass ± SE of Euclea small and large caterpillars was 71.3±4.4 mg and 253.9±13.1 mg respectively, a highly significant difference (t = 13.20, df = 29.46, P <0.0001).
The global correlation across all time points remained highly significant (ρ = 0.65, p < 10 −4 ).
Irrespective of probiotic treatment, the ME content of the diets had a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) effect on the liver weight of broilers when expressed as a percentage of BW.