“highly significant”

On the first day after surgery, median pain levels were highest in the MT group at 7(6, 8), followed by MS at 6(5, 7), and lowest in the TT group at 4(3, 5), with the differences being highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The median (IQR) growth rate of children pre- and post-tests were −4.0 (−5.4–−2.1) SDS and 0.1 (−1.9–1.4) SDS respectively, a difference highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3B ).

As presented in Figure 1B , a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001 ) was observed in the bodyweight of H. manillensis at different growth stages, with the larval stage weighing 0.081 ± 0.031 g, young 1.922 ± 0.563 g, and adults 8.329 ± 2.100 g.

Results Axial length Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between the type of defocus and time of measurement for axial length measures across the six defocus conditions (F (20,300) = 4.60, p < 0.0001).

Among the genes associated with auditory abnormalities, in the cellular component domain, the most strongly enriched term was cytoplasm, with 67% of annotated genes and a highly significant adjusted p ‐value p < 0.0001.

The pairwise F ST values between populations ranged from 0.018 between Tensed and Thornton populations to 0.147 between Dayton2 and Parker Farm populations, although all F ST values were determined to be highly significant through bootstrapping ( P < 0.0001; see Supporting Information—Table S3 ).

Nutrient addition effects on moss-associated N fixation Treatment and sampling time had a highly significant effect on N fixation (p < 0.0001, F = 23.7 and 74.7, respectively), and differences between forest successional stages were also observed (p = 0.017, F = 5.7).

The estimated EPSPS gene copy number ratios between ApR and ApS were highly significant (p < 0.0001) at 9.1 and 8.7 when normalised to the ALS and CPS genes, respectively ( Table 2 ).

RESULTS: Aqua destillata and 10% glucose showed a highly significant higher (p ≤ 0.0001) specific impedance compared to the standard 0.9% saline (factor 360).

The rate of perinatal death was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001) with the number of children a woman had in both survey rounds.

The complex showed highly significant expression levels and complex formation ( P < 0.0001) in all combinations when compared with mock across all capture-detection schemes (fig.

Additionally, diagnosis of colon cancer with both sDC-SIGN and sDC-SIGNR was highly significant (P<0.0001).

Very highly significant difference was found in the distribution of lip print patterns among males and females in the entire population, group I, and group III, respectively ( P < 0.0001).

The Model F-value of mono-EMC17, mono-SMC25 and dual-species was 169.72, 158.20 and 132.70 which depicts that the model is valid and predicted quadratic response are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Vaccination responses of circulating receptor antibodies were highly significant ( p < 0.0001, paired t-test) and persisted for at least six months after the last vaccination shot.

KCNA6 and HCN2 showed highly significant differences (**** p < 0.0001), while KCNC1 and SCN1A also demonstrated significant downregulation (* p < 0.05).

The difference in the number of symmetric divisions that produced two ISC daughter cells was highly significant when comparing ISCs depleted of miR-305 versus control cells ( P = 0.0001, Fisher’s exact test) ( Table 1 ).

Unlike the other families, species richness was higher in the first survey, highlighting a highly significant difference between the two periods ( t = 223.2, p << 0.0001).

As shown in Table 2 , the fitness of the model was highly significant based on the high F -value (227.16) and the very low p -value ( p < 0.0001) [ 20 ].

The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences between categories (χ 2 = 517.7, df = 2, p < 0.0001), while the log-rank test for trend supported a strong linear association between increasing frailty and decreasing survival (χ 2 = 514.6, p < 0.0001).

Target correlation was a highly significant predictor for reaction times across all models and both datasets ( p < 0.0001; summary tables for the GAMs can be found in the Supplementary Materials).

From baseline, the respiratory frequency in the MPA group was significantly lower than that in other groups ( P < 0.001), with the difference remaining highly significant as the MCH concentration increased ( P < 0.0001) (Figs. 3 h).

Multiple regression fitting of the data from Table 3 yielded the following second-order polynomial regression equation: Y = 1.08 + 0.0446A + 0.0190B + 0.0427C − 0.0040AB − 0.0318AC − 0.0327BC − 0.1740A 2 − 0.2231B 2 − 0.2133C 2 As shown in Table 3 the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the lack of fit was not significant ( p = 0.3247 > 0.05).

Considering, within-group comparisons, it was observed all experimental groups showed a highly significant difference across the specified time intervals i.e. 6,12 and 24th week ( p = 0.0001) indicating effective intervention.

The second-order similarity (i.e., correlation between pairwise cosine similarity matrices) between the McRae norms and the CSLB norms is highly significant (Spearman rho; for all 415 items, rho = .624, p < .0001).