“highly significant”

For both survival traits, there was a highly significant line and sex term in the ANOVA ( P <0.0001), as well as a significant line by sex interaction ( P <0.0001).

Using GREAT, we found that about 77% of the genes associated with active TFAP2A peaks are also associated with active MITF peaks, a highly significant overlap (hypergeometric test, p<0.0001) ( Fig 3D ).

This reduction was highly significant across all comparisons ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 1a and Table 3 ).

25 Furthermore, during milk OIT, the risk of reactions and the need for epinephrine treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 25 These patients were also at a higher risk of OIT discontinuation or not achieving full desensitization.

The regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and the lack of fit was not significant ( p = 0.1535 > 0.05), with a goodness of fit R 2 = 0.9879 and the difference between R 2 Adj and R 2 Pre being less than 0.2, indicating that the model had good fit.

All factors of the model were highly significant ( p < 0.0001; data not shown).

The model was highly significant (F = 140.53, P < 0.0001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant (F = 3.62, P = 0.1228), indicating that the model adequately described the relationship between ultrasound parameters and VAP solubility.

There was a highly significant difference among the unirradiated groups compared to control Candida alone, with HSCO cells enhancing and HECV cells inhibiting the proliferation of Candida (p<0.0001 in both cases).

There was a strong correlation between vertical and volume loss; this correlation was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.99 for Tetric Ceram, TEC and Gradia Direct Posterior; p = 0.0001; Fig. 4 ).

Among the outliers detected by coalescent simulations assuming a neutral island model, five were highly significant ( P <0.0001; Table 3 ).

The differences in Kiss1 mRNA levels between hpg and age-matched WT females and males were found to be highly significant by two-way ANOVA (P<0.0001, both female and male) from day 30 onward (P<0.05; Bonferroni post-hoc).

Differences comparing MT/MT with WT/WT and WT/WT with Het are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Nonetheless, just 9.2% (95% confidence intervals 7.3–11.2) of control women met the criteria for metabolic syndrome, more than five-fold fewer than our endometrial cancer patients, a comparison that was highly significant ( p < .0001), and mirrors previous work ( Rosato et al., 2011 ).

According to the ANOVA results, the quadratic polynomial regression models for all five mechanical property indices were highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).

Co-infection analysis showed a highly significant association with HIV (p<0.0001, OR=26.32, 95% CI: 20.22-34.28).

This study did not show a benefit in OS (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI.0.56–1.08; P = 0.13), but did reveal a highly significant improvement in PFS, with 5 year PFS of 47.6 vs. 31.8% for those given immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40–0.73, P < 0.0001).

In addition, fecundity and the collective mass of seeds of a tiller were always tightly correlated: for all years, the correlations between the collective mass of CL seeds and the number of CL seeds were all highly significant ( r 2 from 0.79 to 0.91, all P < 0.0001), as were all correlations between the collective mass of CH seeds and number of CH seeds ( r 2 from 0.82 to 0.95, all P < 0.0001).

ParaHIT Total showed lowest sensitivity (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.19) and highly significant statistically (P < 0.0001).

We found a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.33, P = 0.0001), suggesting some influence of diarrhea severity on racecadotril effectiveness measured by TTR.

For the cabbage diallel study, there were highly significant differences (P < 0.0001) among the genotypes, and based on this result, the user can proceed with interpretation of results from other analyses proposed by Hayman ( 1954b ).

For △ spoIID and △spoIIP , differences observed in each stage are highly significant, with p < 0.0001.

We found a highly significant increase in the expression of Serum and glucocorticoid‐regulated kinase 1 ( Sgk1 , already 1 h after injection, two‐way ANOVA with Šidák's post hoc test, p < 0.0001) and Glucocorticoid‐induced leucine zipper protein ( Gilz / Tsc22d3 , 2 h after injection, p = 0.0015), both targets of GR transactivation.

control) and years were highly significant (treatment: df = 1; χ 2 = 22.18, P < 0.0001; year: df = 2; χ 2 = 824.73, P < 0.0001), while the interaction (treatment × year) was not significantly different (df = 2, χ 2 = 4.03, P = 0.1332).

Using a two-way ANOVA by population (control/migraine) and stimulus duration, the effect of stimulus duration was highly significant (p<0.0001) and the variation between individual subjects was significant (p = 0.0008).

There was a significant heterogeneity among studies I 2 = 88.7% (95% CI: 76.3–94.6%), τ 2 = 17.32, and a highly significant Q -test ( p < 0.0001) ( 14 , 17–20 ).