“highly significant”

The difference between VO 2 peak/kg values was highly significant among all pairwise comparisons ( p < 0.0001), excluding that between the 35–40 kg/m 2 and 40–45 kg/m 2 groups.

In contrast, the average tumor volume in MI-503 group was only 587.19 ± 240.69 mm 3 , highly significant smaller than that in vehicle group ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 A).

A one-way ANOVA of the number of tRNA genes against genome size was highly significant (F=774.9, P <0.0001, DF=1198; Fig. 1 ).

Importantly, a highly significant association was found between the G-allele and response to therapy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients (P<0.0001) but not in HCV genotype 3-infected patients.

The difference between WS individuals and TD controls is highly significant [ t (35) = 6.56, p < 0.0001, two-tailed, with an effect size Cohen’s d = 2.23].

Specifically, P60/T40-P80/AN20 showed highly significant weight loss compared to P60/T40, P80/T20, and P80/AN20 ( p < 0.0001).

Notably, the GSE10072 and TCGA-LUAD datasets showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001), while the GSE140797 dataset, though with a smaller sample size, also exhibited statistical significance ( p < 0.05), as shown in (Fig. 6 ).

The correlation between Gower’s distance matrices based on qualitative and quantitative traits was highly significant (r = 0.41; P < 0.0001).

As the prevalence of ESBL went from 3.78% to 50.80%, it increased 13.4-fold between 2003-2005 and 2018-2019, thus amounting to a highly significant increase (p < 10-4).

Overall, differences in species richness between elevational zones <2000 m were highly significant (ANOVA, F = 244.04, P <0.0001).

Similarly, the PL of HAdV viremia was also associated with non-relapse mortality, albeit with less pronounced significance ( p = 0.013, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6), and revealed a highly significant correlation with HAdV-related mortality ( p = 0.0001, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.2).

Feeling parents’ love was majorly dependent on the level of parents’ involvement, and the influence of both father and mother involvement were highly significant (father, β = 0.959, P <0.0001; mother, β = 0.793, P <0.0001) determinants of adolescent STD/HIV-related sexual risk behavior.

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), clearly demonstrating the superior therapeutic effect of Exclzyme Pet in helping the restoration of joint mobility in osteoarthritic dogs. 3.1.4 Willingness to hold contralateral limb The willingness to hold the contralateral limb during a lameness evaluation is a key clinical indicator, offering insight into the severity of pain, compensatory gait alterations, and the degree of joint inflammation.

A second supportive multivariable analysis used baseline count as a covariate and in that analysis, the baseline term was not significant ( P = 0.627), treatment was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), but study site was not statistically significant ( P = 0.219).

Because of the sample size with normally distributed fluorescence the t-test statistical analysis was highly significant (p<0.0001) in almost all samples.

146.22 ± 41.84 mL/min/100 g, p < 0.008), showing a highly significant correlation with GFR in all subjects (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001).

Average heights have been increasing over the past few decades in several transitioning Asian populations, 17,24 probably as a result of improving childhood nutrition and health, 32 Few data are available for Thailand but, amongst the female TCS participants ( n = 47,314), the youngest group of women (15–19yrs) are on average 3 centimetres taller than the oldest group of women (50+yrs) and there is a highly significant trend of increasing height with decreasing age ( p < 0.0001).

This regression was highly significant (standardized beta = 0.49 ± 0.002, t = 35.25, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.34; linear regression).

A clear and highly significant decrease in the total number of B cells was observed within 4 weeks after treatment in the subjects receiving rituximab (p<0.0001), which was followed by a drop in serum levels of IgA-RF, IgM-RF and IgM, reaching the level of statistical significance (p=0.003, p<0.0001 and p=0.001, respectively) at all time points.

Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for significant differences and p < 0.01 for highly significant differences, with **** indicating p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. 3.

The data on disease severity revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ) in the percentage of necrotic leaf area (%NLA) and pycnidia coverage (%PC) between the isolates, wheat differential lines, and their two-way interactions (Table 2 ).

The difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001) and also significantly different (p = 0.0005) from healthy controls (n = 16), which had low background titers similar to the RA reactivity with untreated HSA.

Indeed, there was a highly significant correlation between MMSE scores and educational level (r=0.601, p<0.0001; data nor shown).

Further analysis comparing the treatment to the sham control revealed highly significant increases in NO production for all the wavelengths, with all the conditions being statistically different from the respective sham controls ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.

Applying the aforementioned post hoc ANCOVA sensitivity analysis, the treatment effect defined by the primary outcome measure remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).