“highly significant”

The TMAO concentrations showed a highly significant difference between patients with CKD and healthy controls ( p < 0.0001).

Survival analysis across all counties showed a highly significant difference in mortality between exposed and unexposed (control) individuals (HR ≈ 0, P < 0.0001), confirming the impact of permethrin exposure across both species.

This difference was highly significant for the screen detected cancers (P <0.0001).

Through statistical analysis using Student’s t-test, we observed highly significant differences in anti-Xa assay results between bleeding and non-bleeding groups ( p < 0.0001) at both peak and trough times.

20 A highly significant association (OR: 61.65, P <0.0001) was also revealed between the use of zidovudine and the occurrence of anemia, as previously reported. 17 However, in this study, young age and female gender were not significantly associated with anemia.

ANOVA results showed a highly significant effect of treatment (F = 11.8, p<0.0001) as well as a significant effect of region (p = 0.0069) ( Fig 4B ).

As tested by in vitro germination and acetocarmine tests, the analysis of variance clearly showed that storage method, days of storage, and the interaction between storage methods and days of storage had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.0001) on pollen viability.

The differences between the medical disciplines were statistically highly significant (Table S 1 ; p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). 3.4.

Most of the questions of patient satisfaction were statistically highly significant ( p <0.0001).

A highly significant correlation (r = 0.475, p <0.0001) was also found between the Ct values of the concordant positive saliva and NPS specimens.

For the PMHS, the KMO amounted to 0.955 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

For human genes, highly significant differences were found between G1 and G2 (F = 1.29; p <0.0001), G1 and G3 (F = 1.33; p <0.0001), or G1 and G4 exons (F = 1.33; p <0.0001), while none was found between G2 and G3 (F = 1.04; p = 0.4254), G2 and G4 (F = 1.03; p = 0.4285), or G3 and G4 exons (F = 1.00; p = 0.9243).

There was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) effect of diet on body weight independent spleen weight.

This shift in outcome with age was highly significant ( χ 2 = 35.40, df = 1, P ‐value <0.0001).

Both IL-12 preparations resulted in highly significant activation of CD4+ and CD8+ cells (p < 0.0001 each) with no significant difference in between heterodimeric IL-12 and single-chain IL-12 (CD4+: p = 0.124, CD8+: p = 0.092) concluding equal bioactivity for both cytokines (figure 5B ).

Obtaining a tumor-free surgical margin decreases the incidence of a local recurrence (LR) of the primary tumor.[ 18 ] There are various risk factors associated with a positive margin, among them are: The extent of excision, age, large tumor size, multifocality, lobular histological type, and the number of positive lymph nodes.[ 19 ] In 30 of 34 reviewed studies, persistent microscopic inadequate (R1) or macroscopic inadequate (R2) surgical margins were highly significant for LR compared to the negative margin (p = 0.0001).[ 20 ] Microscopic disease resulting from a positive margin is more problematic because theoretically, cancer in the relatively hypoxic environment of the lumpectomy scar bed will be resistant to radiation therapy.[ 21 ] Furthermore, the inability to achieve negative margins may be a marker of an excessive tumor burden in the treated breast.

Thus, while the mean IOP reduction among the Black and Indian subgroups was highly significant (p < 0.0001), so was the difference between these subgroups (p < 0.001).

The difference between both groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Finally, the atorvastatin and liraglutide combination treatment group had the lowest body weight increase (and therefore the greatest reduction in weight gain) from 155 ± 5.1 g to only 224 g, when compared to both the HFD and the HFD/atorvastatin groups; this reduction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.

Moreover, when comparing the data for the mice in the two age groups, we found a significant correlation ( p = 0.0205) and a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the number of mature neurons and their escape latencies on day 6 of rMWM, and on days 9 and 10 of cdMWM, respectively, in individual 14MO mice but not in 6MO mice.

A two-way ANOVA detected a highly significant effect of light on E PAR (F1,74= 132.20, p < 0.0001) and a significant species vs. light interaction (F3,74 = 9.71, p < 0.0001), while for the main effect of species no significant differences were detected ( p = 0.627).

During the initial 6 months of the study, the cyclosporine A group had consistently lower IOP than the betamethasone group, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Decoding of uncued orientations was highly significant on both Switch (1–1.4 s after cue onset, corrected p = 0.0001) and Repeat trials (1.05–1.4 s, p = 0.0028, Switch > Repeat 1.25–1.4 s, p = 0.0295; Fig. 5 A , left panel inset).

control highly significant (e.g. in whole length, 32.0 vs . 59.9 mm; p < 0.0001), but were also significant between the two inoculation sets (N1 vs .

Furthermore, the clinical score differences on day four revealed highly significant intergroup variations, with P-values of <0.0001 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS, 0.0005 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS + DH, and 0.0028 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS + HQ (P < 0.005) ( Figure 14A ).