“highly significant”

When micro CT was compared with all the other techniques in analyzing the racial predilection of C-shaped canal configuration, it showed a statistically highly significant result with P < 0.0001 except when compared with CBCT which showed a significant value of P = 0.0303 [ Table 4 ].

RNL lower than 0.650), compared to the controls (statistical differences highly significant, p < 0.0001 for Pt-3, Pt-5 and Pt-8 and p < 0.001 for Pt-4) ( Figure 6 ).

Advanced disease stage of the disease led to a highly significant P = 0.0001 for fatigue.

Cumulative KSS showed an improvement of 75.3 (± 38.1) points and was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, t test).

Year-Effects on P and N in Green Leaves All variables showed highly significant differences among years ( P < 0.0001) and significant interactions of Year ×Age ( Table 1 ).

Cytocentrifugation techniques were better than modified brush cytology technique and modified scrape cytology technique and the values were statistically highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The model was highly significant as indicated by the high F -value (22.72) and the low p -value ( p < 0.0001), but also by the low lack of fit F -value (0.87) and its non-significant associated p -value ( p > 0.05).

There were fewer tolerant genera of yeast in samples that were incubated at 30 °C when the ethanol concentration was raised from 8 to 16%. Figure 12a shows the results of a repeated measures one-way ANOVA with a Geisser-Greenhouse’s epsilon correction, which showed a significant change (P = 0.0260) of the number of tolerant yeasts to ethanol concentrations between genera of yeasts (columns) and a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001) between ethanol concentrations (rows).

For the 170 workers with measured TCDD levels greater than 10 ppt, the Spearman correlation between their cumulative exposure scores and the back- extrapolated lipid levels was highly significant (rho = 0.65, p = 0.0001).

The effect of ridge orientation was highly significant (χ 1 = 17.5, P < 0.0001), which confirmed our findings in experiment 1.

The quadratic model for TS was found to be highly significant (F-value = 31.08; p < 0.0001), with a coefficient of determination R 2 of 0.9756.

Due to the increase in pain intensity ratings during exposure to the C-HP model the time factor was highly significant ( t -stat = 9.5; p < 0.0001).

The analysis revealed a highly significant influence of pH on Cr( vi ) photoreduction efficiency ( F = 762.06, p < 0.0001), with an R 2 = 0.9965, confirming that pH accounted for over 99% of the total variation in removal performance.

For the entire study group, this resulted in a highly significant estimate ( F (2.37)=25.4, p<0.0001, R 2 =0.578).

There were, however, highly significant differences between groups in the extent of this decline ( p < 0.0001 for the interaction between treatment and time, see Fig. 1 A).

The data indicate that the regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the error term is not significant ( p > 0.05).

According to the results of the variation analysis, it was determined that magnetic field intensity interaction was very highly significant ( p < 0.0001) on the DPPH value and the pellicle weight.

4 D ) and the correlation after pooling across neurons was highly significant (Spearman correlation: ITD: r s = −0.92; ILD: r s = −0.89; both p < 0.0001; two-tailed t test; Fig. 4 E , F ).

albopictus ), with statistical analysis (permutation test in MorphoJ) indicating highly significant differences between most of these species ( p < 0.0001; p < 0.01; and p < 0.05; S2 Table ).

It also displayed blood culture to be highly significant in the diagnosis of typhoid fever (p<0.0001).

Overall, the difference between the four groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) due to much earlier gestational age at delivery in women with previous PPROM and treated with Arabin pessary (Figure 2 ).

The differences for each muscle were highly significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.0001).

Jaeger et al 198 have reported similar impressive results—a 75% reduction in Lp(a) and 63% reduction in LDL-C levels and a highly significant 86% ( P < 0.0001) reduction in MACE.

However, when the fertilization rates were adjusted for the mature oocytes (metaphase-II oocytes), there was a highly significant difference in fertilization rates in favour of the group with SDF levels < 15% where the women were in the younger age grouping of <35 years (78.4% vs. 73.0%; p < 0.0001).

There were highly significant correlations between PCF and both PEF (Pearson r = 0.81; p < 0.0001) and FVC (Pearson r = 0.67; p < 0.0001), with the strongest correlation between PCF and PEF ( Figure 2 ).