“highly significant”

The correlation of F rest with F ref was highly significant (HA 1: Spearman r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; HA 2: Spearman r = 0.84, p < 0.0001) and the regression lines were almost parallel to the bisector, indicating that F rest and F ref were tightly coupled (Fig. 5 ).

Seventy-four samples were run in parallel using both methods, and there was a highly significant correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.97, p <0.0001).

However, this tendency was highly significant when considering all the sites (Jost’s combined significance test, p < 0.0001; Table S7 ).

Among cases with mixed chimerism in the whole blood, as determined by PCR -based method, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the two methods (Pearson r = 0.651, p > 0.0001).

Linear regression analysis performed using the Passing-Bablok technique showed that the highly significant relationship between these two variables is given by the quadratic equation NFA FIJI = 2.78 × 10 −4 (NFL) 2 + 0.72(NFL) + 471 (solid curve in Fig. 7 ; p < 0.0001).

The difference in GERD-HRQL before and after RAP was highly significant (absolute reduction 22.3, P < 0.0001, 95 % CI 19.3 – 25.3).

The highly significant correlation between CAP A-phases and relevant pulse wave amplitude drops ( p < 0.0001) suggests a possible role of autonomic arousals as a marker of cerebral response to respiratory events and confirms the significance of PWA drops as indirect electrophysiological biomarkers of sleep instability.

While TBCs + palaeotemperature has been identified as the best model, with a moderately good R 2 value, within this model TBCs is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) but the palaeotemperature proxy is not ( p = 0.76).

This response to therapy was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the IC 50 of acarbose, used as a positive control, and the IC 50 of EHA ( p < 0,0001) and EA and EE ( p < 0.01). 3.3.2.

As tested by in vitro germination and acetocarmine tests, the analysis of variance clearly showed that storage method, days of storage, and the interaction between storage methods and days of storage had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.0001) on pollen viability.

Differences between singletons and between twins are highly significant ( p =0.0001 and p =0.0002, respectively).

A logistic regression analysis revealed this to be a highly significant difference (b = 2.74, 95% CI = [1.94, 3.54], z = 6.7, p < 10 −4 ).

In our study, we observed a highly significant increase ( Table 2 : p ≤ 0.0001; FC = +8.187) in hypoxanthine excretion in all 20 cases studies, which peaked at one hour after alcohol consumption in 18 of the cases, and at 2 hours in the other two cases ( Fig 4E ).

The chi-square tests indicated highly significant relationships across all comparisons (p < 0.0001), confirming that the observed distributions were not random ( Table 2 ).

A paired t-test showed a highly significant difference, t (9) = 12.17, p < 0.0001, with a very large effect size (Cohen's d_z = 3.85; partial η 2 = 0.943), indicating a marked and highly consistent advantage of the robotic system ( Tables 1 , 2 , Figure 5 ).

There was a significant heterogeneity among studies I 2 = 88.7% (95% CI: 76.3–94.6%), τ 2 = 17.32, and a highly significant Q -test ( p < 0.0001) ( 14 , 17–20 ).

Figure 6 (left panel) demonstrates that, within these 702 node-positive patients, a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.0001) existed between the numbers of RNM at presentation and the rates of LRR through 15 postoperative years.

While CSF levels from control cases were largely close to LOD, the TBI group shows statistically highly significant elevated levels in CSF ( p < 0.0001, see Fig. 3b ), but no differences regarding the TBI bleeding type ( p = 0.7240; see Supplemental Table 1 ).

ANOVA indicated a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference in the average percentage of window filtered Sum Vector Magnitude among low-/high-acceleration ADLs and fall.

Whereas centrosomal pT676 staining in cells expressing GFP alone was essentially the same as in untransfected cells (the median value of F pT676 (GFP+)/ F pT676 (GFP–) was close to 1), there was a twofold reduction in centrosomal pT676 in cells expressing GFP-Cetn3 ( Figure 10B ), and the difference between GFP and GFP-Cetn3 was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

First, the 3 × 3 TSM table for a candidate C‐PAS must show a highly significant targeting preference ( P < 0.0001, 8 df).

Post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison analysis between groups [ Table 3b ] indicated that mean of most of the treatment groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Nest growth was a reliable predictor of nest productivity: we found a highly significant, positive correlation between brood value at worker maturation and nest growth (Fig. 3 ; LM, t = 5.85, p < 0.0001).

The non-parametric Spearman correlation test confirmed a highly significant negative correlation between 25-OH-vitamin D3 and CTX, regardless of the age (r = −0.2295, p <0.0001) ( Fig. 2 A).